SingYourHeartsOut
"Its less confusing with a smaller brain"
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 38,318
- Reaction score
- 37,287
I know we got out of jail in a way, but did you see the xG? Something like 0.5 v 2.5
He sounds and looks like a beaten man. Happy cooking days."It was just one of those things he couldn't help"
Seriously Eddie Howe?
Lip reading him he definitely said, “I don’t understand it” i.e. why he did it when he was sent off. As he also said in the interview, “...we have to support him" so I guess he doesn’t want to upset the apple cart."It was just one of those things he couldn't help"
Seriously Eddie Howe?
If Wolves get beat, I never watch it.While I am obviously pleased that we get to be first on, does it really matter? Do people watch to see their own teams, or all the games?
If Wolves get beat, I never watch it.
I was in Thailand semi final day, watching texts on a phone, have still never seen the Watford goals.
If Wolves get beat, I never watch it.
I was in Thailand semi final day, watching texts on a phone, have still never seen the Watford goals.
I was hoping they’d focus on Neto’s contribution more. His goal sparked the comeback.Lovely end to the day watching MOTD tonight. All about Wolves, and all positive. Just wonderful.
They havnt got all night to be fair.I was hoping they’d focus on Neto’s contribution more. His goal sparked the comeback.
I do wish the commentators could pronounce names correctly.
Jimenez ffs JIMENEZ, say it like
hi me nez not ****ing hi may nayze.
Does my ****ing head in.
Rant over.
So a fair score would have been 1-3 to us, or 0-2.I know we got out of jail in a way, but did you see the xG? Something like 0.5 v 2.5
Some do, but not the one on tonight.Actually they say it right. Well, up until the z I suppose.
So a fair score would have been 1-3 to us, or 0-2.
They praised the forwards, and Netos goal, let's quietly slip under the radar and keep our team intact for another season.I was hoping they’d focus on Neto’s contribution more. His goal sparked the comeback.
I know. But they often pick up on a talking point and Neto’s recent form and goals for a 19 yr old I thought would be the story. We know how good Traore and Jimenez can be, they’ve mentioned them loads in the past. Just thought it’d be good to give the young lad a spot in the limelight. He deserves it! Hopefully there will be lots more opportunities for the panel to sing his praises in the coming weeks!They havnt got all night to be fair.
Never understood what that meansI know we got out of jail in a way, but did you see the xG? Something like 0.5 v 2.5
Much prefer the days of Mike Williamson,George Saville ,Lee Evans .Jon Daddy and Andy WeimannLinekar, Shearer and Wright full of praise for our forwards, what amazing times we are living in.
Well..... You ARE a referee....Much prefer the days of Mike Williamson,George Saville ,Lee Evans .Jon Daddy and Andy Weimann
I much prefer the football under Lambo
Tbh at 1-0 I still thought it was 1-3 game. Only when it went 2-0 and we seemed to be making too many uncharacteristic mistakes was I in any doubt. Then as soon as it went 2-1 I felt we would at least get the draw. Tbf to them though at 2-2 with plenty on the clock it could have gone either way.So a fair score would have been 1-3 to us, or 0-2.
Never understood what that means
Consider yourself lucky, some of us can't forget them...If Wolves get beat, I never watch it.
I was in Thailand semi final day, watching texts on a phone, have still never seen the Watford goals.
They give shots on goal a rating of how likely that attempt is to go in, add all the individual ratings up and that's your xG for the match. A shot from 30 yards has a low probability of being a goal so might be 0.02xG (1 in 50), whereas a penalty is I think 0.72xG. It gives a clearer indication of the type of chances created. So two sides, 50-50 possession, both with 10 attempts on goal, both 5 on target so the game looks very even from the stats on the face of it. But if the xG is 0.4 vs 3.2, the side with 3.2 has created the better chances while the side with 0.4 has probably been taking pot shots from distanceMe neither Jonzy, anyone care to enlighten us?
Me neither Jonzy, anyone care to enlighten us?
This. I think.They give shots on goal a rating of how likely that attempt is to go in, add all the individual ratings up and that's your xG for the match. A shot from 30 yards has a low probability of being a goal so might be 0.02xG (1 in 50), whereas a penalty is I think 0.72xG. It gives a clearer indication of the type of chances created. So two sides, 50-50 possession, both with 10 attempts on goal, both 5 on target so the game looks very even from the stats on the face of it. But if the xG is 0.4 vs 3.2, the side with 3.2 has created the better chances while the side with 0.4 has probably been taking pot shots from distance
But do we pronounce NEVES correctly? I heard portugese tv saying "Nevsch"I do wish the commentators could pronounce names correctly.
Jimenez ffs JIMENEZ, say it like
hi me nez not ****ing hi may nayze.
Does my ****ing head in.
Rant over.
Actually
Joelinton, not bloody Joe Elinton.
if we had got beat today I would have been more annoyed by these ****s.
Commentators, DO YOUR JOBS YOU ****S.
Innit funny the first year of Var and suddenly Bournemouth are struggling.
But do we pronounce NEVES correctly? I heard portugese tv saying "Nevsch"
It is if your Portuguese. Mind you, if the commentator is going to bother saying ‘hiMENez’, (going with the H for J and stressing second syllable as it should be) then might as well finish with ‘eth’ not ‘z’.
Half assing it is just silly.
Sounds like a new game by Waddington’sThey give shots on goal a rating of how likely that attempt is to go in, add all the individual ratings up and that's your xG for the match. A shot from 30 yards has a low probability of being a goal so might be 0.02xG (1 in 50), whereas a penalty is I think 0.72xG. It gives a clearer indication of the type of chances created. So two sides, 50-50 possession, both with 10 attempts on goal, both 5 on target so the game looks very even from the stats on the face of it. But if the xG is 0.4 vs 3.2, the side with 3.2 has created the better chances while the side with 0.4 has probably been taking pot shots from distance
It is if you’re Portuguese. Mind you, if the commentator is going to bother saying ‘hiMENez’, (going with the H for J and stressing second syllable as it should be) then might as well finish with ‘eth’ not ‘z’.
Half assing it is just silly.