Well well well! Looks like he is going nowhere this summer.
Beat me to it. Can we assume this is why he plays regardless of form?
Its quite obvious isnt?
I think its very worrying that commercial value now strongly influences both transfers and team selection.
I think the answer is a few posts up mate.Quite how he is even getting a game is very very strange. His selection against Norwich was a joke after his awful cameo against Man City.
I think the answer is a few posts up mate.
…and none of that will mean **** if we’re in the Championship.Its quite obvious isnt?
I think its very worrying that commercial value now strongly influences both transfers and team selection.
Bringing fact into the argument is just not fair!That 2000% thing is absolute nonsense.
A) you can see the Youtube views, it hasn't increased.
B)Do they even have youtube in South Korea?
C) It's a small population.
The key to your last question is the "If there is even any remote truth.." part. It really is so unlikely and that is probably the clue to the truth of it.Could have just spent 14 million on a useful midfielder, got into Europe and taken all the financial rewards from that.
If there is even any remote truth in what's suggested, what sort of manager present or future is willingly accepting those terms?
All tuning in to see if he’s as **** as they’ve heard
Not really... If my Countdown maths are anything to go by..2000%???? Seems a bit high to me
What I have been saying all along. The Happy Clappers wouldn't have it though.Well well well! Looks like he is going nowhere this summer.
That 2000% thing is absolute nonsense.
A) you can see the Youtube views, it hasn't increased.
B)Do they even have youtube in South Korea?
C) It's a small population. South Korea has no marketing value.
South Korea’s population is only 4 million less than England.Bringing fact into the argument is just not fair!
That 2000% thing is absolute nonsense.
A) you can see the Youtube views, it hasn't increased.
B)Do they even have youtube in South Korea?
C) It's a small population. South Korea has no marketing value.
Buying players as marketing tools aside, you’re completely wrong about South Korea.
It is 50 million people and yes they have Youtube literally their most searched website last month.That 2000% thing is absolute nonsense.
A) you can see the Youtube views, it hasn't increased.
B)Do they even have youtube in South Korea?
C) It's a small population. South Korea has no marketing value.
It is 50 million people and yes they have Youtube literally their most searched website last month.
Are you thinking of North Korea?
South Korean's have nearly double the household disposable income as Mexico. Not even going to mention Columbia.No are you thinking of China/ India? Those aren't really impressive numbers?
Mexican or even Columbia would be a far bigger market and a more footballing obsessed culture.
Colombia and S Korea have virtually identical populations, but as you say the latter is by far the richer per capita - and far more obsessed with football since co-hosting the World Cup.South Korean's have nearly double the household disposable income as Mexico. Not even going to mention Columbia.
You are right this isn't going to make us millions but it is a decent size market in a rich country.
If we can translate the comments under the videos we should be able to learn the phrase "why has he kicked it so far in front of himself" pretty quickly.All tuning in to see if he’s as **** as they’ve heard
It is 50 million people and yes they have Youtube literally their most searched website last month.
Are you thinking of North Korea?
Yeah he isn't worse than Trincão.Or South Korea 200 years ago!
Makes you wonder if the UK has Google, these things are so easily looked up. I think all sense of objectivity has disappeared with Hwang, he has clearly upset some to the core of their being.For me, he 's not good enough for our level, but not truly awful either. Pretty much at the same level as the likes of Cav and Costa. Being lower half Premier League level does not deserve the vile abuse he's getting here.
I agree he might turn out to be an OK PL squad member - no doubt others will disagree.Being lower half Premier League level does not deserve the vile abuse and scapegoating he's getting here.
Surely the answer is to play a Korean who has the ability to play at this level.
I hope this move does help the club commercially, because this lad is an absolutely woeful footballer.
He is up there with Jesus Vallejo as the worst player I've seen in the fosun era.Absolute garbage
Didn't we sign Paul Gladon under Fosun?And I just don't see how scoring 5 goals in a team that cant' score goals could make him the worst signing under Fosun?
I don't get it. How much money can really we make from our highlights? More like adverts.
I hope this move does help the club commercially, because this lad is an absolutely woeful footballer.
He is up there with Jesus Vallejo as the worst player I've seen in the fosun era.Absolute garbage
Vallejo starting for Real, come off it fella. They've won the league and have the final soon. Like saying Ruddy is starting for usJesus Vallejo whose currently starting for Real Madrid and is now ranked as their #10 player on WhoScored?
And I just don't see how scoring 5 goals in a team that cant' score goals could make him the worst signing under Fosun? That is just so much hyperbole and exagerration. Compared to , say ,Cutrone, Hwang has done much better. Cutrone had a song, and was "liked" despite not at any point looking a Premier League striker. Lokos like it's non-footballing reasons. Some players are "popular" and fans will go to any lengths to explain away their poor output. Others are just unpopular for whatever reason and that's, that? Fabio can miss sitters but "at least he's in the right place". Hwang scores but "it was a tap in my granny could have scored". It's always been that way with football.
Take Hwangs goals off and I make it we'd be in 11th right now, probably dropping more after defeat to Liverpool. How many millions are the 3 extra places i nthe table worth again?