D
Deleted member 5962
Guest
Yes, **** off, should suffice!
I'd personally be wacking the Leeds owner with a law suit, but I'm pretty damned vindictive when people insult me..
Yes, **** off, should suffice!
I wonder if FOSUN would have to relinquish this contact to Gestifute in the end.Think clubs are trying to argue that since Fosun own a share of Gestifute, it means Gestifute have a stake in the club and thereby our players. Seems the only tenuous ******** I could imagine they could cook up.
Yes, **** off, should suffice!
I assume nothing has changed in the 'ownership' of wolves or the relationship with Mendes since the FA (and I presume the EFL) gave approval for Fosun to buy wolves.
I find it hard to see (if nothing has changed) how they can retrospectively change the rules.
Controversial Wolves takeover cleared by FA despite links to Jorge Mendes
Taken from the above article (December 2016)
"But the FA, when examining the takeover, looked into the matter and found there to be no issue. The formal ties between Fosun and Gestifute were considered to be so minor that they were not enough to represent a ‘conflict of interest’ under FA rules".
We have to be careful with the expenditure but you would expect Jeff and co to be all over that.
It will - at Villa Park on Saturday. Leave the other clubs to cry wolf.
Until Neves and Jota arrived. Two players who have no business playing in the Championship for relative peanuts.I assume nothing has changed in the 'ownership' of wolves or the relationship with Mendes since the FA (and I presume the EFL) gave approval for Fosun to buy wolves.
I find it hard to see (if nothing has changed) how they can retrospectively change the rules.
Controversial Wolves takeover cleared by FA despite links to Jorge Mendes
Taken from the above article (December 2016)
"But the FA, when examining the takeover, looked into the matter and found there to be no issue. The formal ties between Fosun and Gestifute were considered to be so minor that they were not enough to represent a ‘conflict of interest’ under FA rules".
We have to be careful with the expenditure but you would expect Jeff and co to be all over that.
That's EXACTLY what has been coming to mind ever since the news first broke. Got an awful feeling that we are going to be hammered with a huge points deduction - even if it was an innocent mistake over where the grey area becomes black.
Club could do with making a short statement.
As I said in the other thread, this seems to amount to them having no evidence against us, so they are hoping if they probe, we will drop ourselves in the ****. Really appears to be sad tbh.
Please explain 3rd party ownership in simple terms and does this mean we are ****ed?
No we arent' ****ed at all. Third party ownership is when someone owns a player and leases them out for x years of the contract in return for a feePlease explain 3rd party ownership in simple terms and does this mean we are ****ed?
The whole debacle reminds me of the Trump-Russia witch hunt. Blanket assertions with no evidence. Jealous people are flinging **** at the wall and desperately praying something sticks.
I was going to say the same. There's not even an investigation, it's just a meeting in the board room.As I read it, the EFL is simply going to meet the club, reiterate the rules, and ask if anything has changed. So long as we haven’t done anything stupid- which I find unlikely- there is nothing to be seen here citizens.
And here ends the “story”.EFL statement on Wolves:
The EFL Executive will meet with the management of the club to reiterate the requirements of our regulations and those of the FA. It should be noted that the club was explicitly informed in July 2016 of all the requirements it was expected to meet. The club has confirmed that the undertakings given at the time remain in place and are being complied with
It should be noted that the club was explicitly informed in July 2016 of all the requirements it was expected to meet. The club has confirmed that the undertakings given at the time remain in place and are being complied with
We are talking about Jorge Mendes here, not Willie McKay, you don't become the most respected agent in world football by being incompetent. He's been involved in many deals in recent years involving Premier League clubs so he knows the rules, also he's not going to risk his reputation, a ban from football and his future earnings by doing some dodgy deals in the English 2nd division that make him relative peanuts compared with what he earns elsewhere.
and it's illegal according to FIFAIn the simplest terms, it means that another entity owns a share in the contracts of our players.
and it's illegal according to FIFA
don't be daft.Well, yea, I was giving the simplest definition of third party ownership, which, of course, is illegal.. Are you implying I'm suggesting its legal?
don't be daft.
Until Neves and Jota arrived. Two players who have no business playing in the Championship for relative peanuts.
Just saying what I read after I posted the questionThen what? I dont get the point of your previous post if you arent trying to infer something.
Sky thinking we culd be in
Just saying what I read after I posted the question
I ain't the Twitter police lol!Fair enough then