Lots of people would mate, including me.If you’d asked me at the start of the summer would I have taken that deal on Nunes, I’d have bitten your hand off.
At the start of the summer I'd have done a straight swap for Steve Daley.If you’d asked me at the start of the summer would I have taken that deal on Nunes, I’d have bitten your hand off.
Really hard to say as we don't seem to have a strategy.Given the sums we've received for Neves and Nunes, versus what we've spent.
Realistically, how many years do you think it'll be before we break our transfer record again?
He maybe just saying that to cover his earlier post.Interesting comment on payment terms. Maybe not 53m in cash all up front then?
We want it all,we want it all,we want it all and we want it now !
Try looking at the bigger picture . We get the money up front a large discount on 2 players . This probably equates to £60m . Plus most on here think Nunes was carp anywayWell its true. We reportedly want 60 million, then agree to 47.
Cue the posts declaring this is another Liverpool/Jota style rip off and we won't get the final payment for another 8 years......
The extra £6m represents the interest on the payment being made in instalments.Cue the posts declaring this is another Liverpool/Jota style rip off and we won't get the final payment for another 8 years......
I have been critical of the club but this is a good deal. If Doyle looks good we exercise the option. If he flops or, God forbid, we go down and have to cut our cloth we do not and have avoided wasting up to £15M which we would have spent in signing him as a stand-alone deal. We pay nothing until next summer in any event. Only if Doyle becomes a player worth more than £35M do we "lose" money on this deal.Whats less than 5 million? Are we paying a loan fee as well? I just think in the scheme of things, we could come out with a 7.5 million profit on him if he becomes a 30 million footballer. Thats not great.
Footballers really don't live on the same planet as the rest of us do they?Just put SSN on and Jay Bothroyd just said ‘ These opportunities don’t come along very often and he should be allowed to put his foot down to get what he wants by going on strike ‘No regard for the club who pay his wages ,his team mates or even the fans and the fact he was contracted here for another 4 years isn’t worth the paper it’s written on .
I just want him out my club !!!!
Is that you Delboy?Sketchley's lost my sheepskin back in 82 for 6 weeks before they found it, by that time spring had bloody sprung and was too warm to wear it!
Because the Doyle deal is separate but parallel Sporting get less. Had it been one deal they would have got more.Its pleasing we squeezed a bit more out of them. If we sign Doyle for £4.3m that is also worth another £6m imv in terms of his sell on value. So we are creeping close to £60m although Sporting get 10% of any profit unfortunately. Now how wisely can it be re-invested?|£15m has already gone on Santiago and Enso. If only we could finally get in a grown up striker to compete with Sasa and Fabio. We have waited three years.
On paper sales this summer have brought in some £145m-£100m alone for Neves and Nunes. So far we have had two frees in King and Doc and |£15m spent on Santiago and Enso. There should be at least £50m to spend on reinforcements.
There is no strategy as far as I can see. Sacking/removing Loptegui has blown all 'plans' out of the water.Really hard to say as we don't seem to have a strategy.
The only thing I can guarantee is Fabio or say Gomes have a good season then they will be gone . Other teams challenging the top six haven't sold their star players as they have more of a plan and also develop their stadiums and training facilities .
However you look at it we don't have a strategy at the moment to move forward . Just to standstill and it is proven by the ground not just the managerial appointments or player signings.
a few seasons ago I would have said we are a top 8/10 Prem side I would say 12th to 20th now is our realistic goal due to the Project failing and having no backup plans .
I'd dispute that all those clubs you mentioned have strengthened significantly or overtaken us. Palace lost their talisman and best player and haven't brought anyone significant in and West Ham lost Rice and have only just started the process of replacing him. Brentford have lost Toney for a significant chunk of the season and lost their starting keeper but brought in 3. Fulham have lost their best player and replaced him with a couple of gambles in Raul and Adama. I'd say all those clubs have just about stood still rather than strengthening.There is no strategy as far as I can see. Sacking/removing Loptegui has blown all 'plans' out of the water.
For a club like Wolves the first aim is to remain in the Premier League. The second aim is to be clear of the bottom six avoiding panic stations. The third aim is to compete at 10-12 level-comfortable mid table. The fourth aim is to creep into the 6-8 places and perhaps sneak into the Europa League. That's about it.
At the moment we are in danger of being a bottom six club, narrowly avoiding relegation. Even the most optimistic would see us as a 13th or 14th placed club at best as things stand. We have been overtaken by Newcastle, Villa, Brighton, Brentford, Palace, West Ham and Fulham for starters - all of whom have strengthened significantly this summer. Luton, Sheff U and Burnley are definitely bottom six and you can probably add Bournemouth, Forest and Everton to that group with us just above them.
More cards than goals. Impressive!
Yes but this is why Jay Bothroyd should not be given a platform as he makes pondlife look eruditeJust put SSN on and Jay Bothroyd just said ‘ These opportunities don’t come along very often and he should be allowed to put his foot down to get what he wants by going on strike ‘No regard for the club who pay his wages ,his team mates or even the fans and the fact he was contracted here for another 4 years isn’t worth the paper it’s written on .
I just want him out my club !!!!
So what?Indeed, but read by millions who won't know the intricacies of the deal and will believe what the papers tell them!
I really think he will be great with CityWill be interesting to see how he does at City. Hasn't he been bought partly to replace/compete with Kalvin Philips? That's another who Pep rated highly, but has struggled to fit in with their team.
I know that players look better when surrounded by better players. And Pep (and/or his staff) are among the very best at developing players. But for us, Nunes has not really shown that he is near the level of City. He's going to have to go up two levels from what we've seen to get close to their first XI. As @Norwegian Wolf pointed out, he has a lot of weaknesses that we see several times *every* match. While his strengths, we were lucky to see once every 4 games. One nice run leaving 2 or 3 opponents behind , around the half way line, followed by ... well, not much.
Overall, under Fosun, I don't think we have a record of players transforming into world beaters after leaving. The likes of Jota, Goncalves wanted to leave anyway. Cav, Costa, Coady, Doc and plenty of others , have never done anything beyond what we saw here - often looking even worse. The jury still out on Collins , though it appears he was sold for financial needs ahead of footballing reasons. As for Ruben Vinagre...well.
TLDR: I wouldn't be surprised if Nunes underwhelms at City. Or at least, takes 2 or 3 seasons to make an impact. We can't afford that wait anyway.
I agree with this. He will either become good at City or not play very much. We will see which it will be...but he doesn't seem to have that dog in him that I think Pep needs.TLDR: I wouldn't be surprised if Nunes underwhelms at City. Or at least, takes 2 or 3 seasons to make an impact. We can't afford that wait anyway.