I’d sign Trincao for £10m tbhIf Sporting think Trincao is only worth a 10m risk, do you think anyone would take a 10m risk on Traore?
They only get 50% of him for that it’s a deal designed to shaft us of our 20%I’d sign Trincao for £10m tbh
There’s absolutely no way we’ve loaned Fabio out without another striker coming in. No chance.
Jeff would never give them 50% of future sale either.They only get 50% of him for that it’s a deal designed to shaft us of our 20%
Eh, let's be real, 2-3 bad results and Molineux will turn. Not sure why we are pretending otherwise.No it won't. The loony fringe that frequents the Mix is not representative of the Molineux crowd
They only get 50% of him for that it’s a deal designed to shaft us of our 20%
Eh, let's be real, 2-3 bad results and Molineux will turn. Not sure why we are pretending otherwise.
Pelters or not you're right, every matchday attending fan I know is well ****ed off at the moment.I got pelters for suggesting that mate. **** happy clappers lol.
We are not as bad as people make out .. we need to keep players we have plus 3 signings CB .. CM .. Striker .. would also like a couple of 18 to 20 years old to develop .. maybe the Chilean lad Dario Osorio and one more
so Trincao would have essentially cost us 4/5 million?
Well get 20% of the £10m that Sporting give Barca. Barca will then still own 50% of him of which we get bugger all.How? We should get 20% of any future income Barca will get from Trincao.
I think Hwang is actually ok as a goal scorer and therefore as back up to Raul, it is using him as a LW or inside left thats the mistake.
What to buy net of the loan fee? No. 10m is only half of his economic rights. We’d have had to pay double that or accept a 50% sell on clause (as sale of part economic rights is not permitted here).so Trincao would have essentially cost us 4/5 million?
Imagine if we had an entire year to line up a bunch of signings including contingencies with their agents so we ensured we wouldn't be in this position when the window opened.....We might have been turned down by several players that Bruno and Jeff had really wanted.
We will get nothing of the second 10million, we already got shafted mate.Well get 20% of the £10m that Sporting give Barca. Barca will then still own 50% of him of which we get bugger all.
That would suggest a degree of professionalism/planning, scurrilous suggestion, repeat after me "In Jeff we Trust".Imagine if we had an entire year to line up a bunch of signings including contingencies with their agents so we ensured we wouldn't be in this position when the window opened.....
Interesting as it appears he’s not been in the 11 for either the first or second half of Benfica’s game vs Reading today. Game just about to finish shortly.
You just have to laugh now.
watched some of the first half, comms mentioned us a few times but no idea what they were on about as it was portugeseInteresting as it appears he’s not been in the 11 for either the first or second half of Benfica’s game vs Reading today. Game just about to finish shortly.
?? LolGood to see Cutrone back contributing. He is indicative of the group and the clubs ethos really that has and still is building, once part of the back, always the part of the pack. I think the loan spells has done great for his development and we can welcome him back genuinely like a new signing.
Did they sound like they were laughing, or was there a hint of venom?watched some of the first half, comms mentioned us a few times but no idea what they were on about as it was portugese
Ah, the refrain of slaves in the market.Just hope we're sold soon.
Eh, let's be real, 2-3 bad results and Molineux will turn. Not sure why we are pretending otherwise.
Strange analogy but guess you have your reasons.Ah, the refrain of slaves in the market.
It was meant to be ironic.Strange analogy but guess you have your reasons.
Well it impressed me tbfIt was meant to be ironic.
Why wouldn’t we get 20% of the future transfer as we did with Goncalves?Well get 20% of the £10m that Sporting give Barca. Barca will then still own 50% of him of which we get bugger all.
Couldn't find the appropriate emoji. But a turkey wishing for Christmas would be another way of putting it. I just don't believe there is a shining knight out there waiting to save us from the wicked Chinese uncle.Well it impressed me tbf
Absolutely plays a part and I dont begrudge it either.Four players on £50k a week is £1.6m in wages over two months.
Not saying it’s a major reason, but if I were a financially minded chairman looking to stretch my finances I’d also probably leave signings until later in the window than sooner.
Also, a major cash flow benefit in getting your loanees and released players out early but your signings in later. We could be talking about a near £3m benefit by doing this.
Wouldn’t be at all surprised if this is at least in their mind.
False equivalence, doubt the slave had the opportunity of a shining knight, whereas there's every chance we could find "better" owners, maybe/maybe not but not out of the question.Couldn't find the appropriate emoji. But a turkey wishing for Christmas would be another way of putting it. I just don't believe there is a shining knight out there waiting to save us from the wicked Chinese uncle.
But how many points might that cost us.Four players on £50k a week is £1.6m in wages over two months.
Not saying it’s a major reason, but if I were a financially minded chairman looking to stretch my finances I’d also probably leave signings until later in the window than sooner.
Also, a major cash flow benefit in getting your loanees and released players out early but your signings in later. We could be talking about a near £3m benefit by doing this.
Wouldn’t be at all surprised if this is at least in their mind.
Isn’t that every club outside the top 4 or 5?Imo we’re still very exposed if we have a bad run of injuries and suspensions even if we get those extra players in.