Welcome Notice

Hello and welcome to Molineux Mix a forum for Wolves fans by Wolves fans.

Register Log in

Stadium Plans

Jay Jay de Wolf

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Apr 28, 2018
Messages
3,876
Reaction score
3,926
I've got this hypothetical question and thought if bob the builder (Steve Morgan) would have been here still or kept a share in WWFC.
Would he have finished his redevelopment plans of 3 phases for Molineux and built it by now and especially throughout the lock downs periods?

Remember Sir Jack having an agreement with SM when he handed over the club to him for £10. That SM would guarantee Sir Jack he would put £30,000 spending into players. Why didn't SM ask Fosun to guarantee him that the redevelopment of Molinuex would take place within 10 years?
 

WickedWolfie

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
42,102
Reaction score
47,356
I've got this hypothetical question and thought if bob the builder (Steve Morgan) would have been here still or kept a share in WWFC.
Would he have finished his redevelopment plans of 3 phases for Molineux and built it by now and especially throughout the lock downs periods?

Remember Sir Jack having an agreement with SM when he handed over the club to him for £10. That SM would guarantee Sir Jack he would put £30,000 spending into players. Why didn't SM ask Fosun to guarantee him that the redevelopment of Molinuex would take place within 10 years?
Perhaps Sir Jack was happy with the ground that he'd built?
 

Padraig

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
4,022
Reaction score
4,402
Burnley now go on the list of “teams with bigger big screens than us”, which includes other illustrious clubs such as Walsall and Watford.

In fact Turf Moor inside was pretty tidy, it’s clearly had some money spent on it.

If the club won’t spend a penny on general stadium upkeep (broken TVs in the concourse, even a lick of paint) or match day experience improvements (screens), there’s no way we’re getting any new seats. There’s still bare foundations outside the Graham Hughes ffs. Where the pop-up shop used to be. Been there over a year with heras fencing around it.

Tells you all you need to know about the ownership’s commitment/willingness to invest. And that cheeky ***** Vincent will still try and jack the prices up.
 

TFWanderers

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
6,438
Reaction score
2,080
I spoke to the Architect who designed the SJH stands , many years ago about expansion. He told me both the South Bank and Billy Wright were both designed to “bolt on” another tier and highering the roof. The club actually showed a model of the proposed infill of the south bank corners but failure on the pitch mothballed that idea. The “goalpost” supports on the north bank prevented any expansion and the Steve Bull is pre- cast concrete not steel, so cannot be expanded in the same way.
Is there a reason why the Bully was made of pre-cast concrete? Was it the norm at the time?

I know it was very much a 60's building method using concrete but as we saw with the Molineux Sports Centre, it really doesn't take much to start cracking and then it eventually needs to be demolished.
 

Sussex Wolf

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
24,317
Reaction score
34,149
Is there a reason why the Bully was made of pre-cast concrete? Was it the norm at the time?

I know it was very much a 60's building method using concrete but as we saw with the Molineux Sports Centre, it really doesn't take much to start cracking and then it eventually needs to be demolished.

It was the norm in the late seventies when it was designed and built.

Concrete can last a very long time, as the Romans proved…

 

whitnash wolf ex.dewsbury

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
4,880
Reaction score
3,862
Can`t find a reference but I`m sure I remember when SJH built the North Bank it was said because
the roof was goal post supported it would be easy to replace.
In fact the only reference I can find is in Simon Inglis`s fine book Football Grounds of Britain
where he says to cantilever the roof would have cost an extra £50,000 when money was tight
but the roof could easily be redesigned
later statements have said the goal post supports meant the roof was not easy to replace
 

beppe7619

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
394
Reaction score
271
Is there a reason why the Bully was made of pre-cast concrete? Was it the norm at the time?

I know it was very much a 60's building method using concrete but as we saw with the Molineux Sports Centre, it really doesn't take much to start cracking and then it eventually needs to be demolished.
The market multi storey car park was built with concrete and collapsed in the late 90s lucky there was no injuries
 

Lupus ad Penn

Groupie
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
283
Reaction score
940
The use of concrete wasn’t the problem with the collapsed car park in Piper’s Row. Some of the top floor collapsed due to issues with corrosion of the metal inside the construction due to pooling of rain water and use of salt in icy weather. None of these issues should effect the Steve Bull, as it is fully weather proofed by the roof and external walls and cladding.
 

Oldgoldilox

Groupie
Joined
Sep 9, 2019
Messages
327
Reaction score
600
Ive often thought recently that the mild hysteria around the Steve Bull "sinking" and about to be "condemned" was born of the Pipers Row collapse.

Having done the new Tottenham stadium tour recently, its is certainly true what others have said, the facilities at Molineux are 30 years out of date, we dont know what's in the mind of the management at the moment but they have said that it involves co-operation with the council, University and Asda . I guess the issue is when you involve three other parties you're tripling the amount of governance required to get things moving and with one party's decision probably dependent on another's with that comes a similar lengthening of time to conclude and move. Throw in a pandemic, raw material and commodity costs going through the roof, cost of living crisis for the punters who would buy the additional seats and you have to conclude that now is probably not the best time to push the button on stadium expansion. Two years time minimum I reckon before we get any news on that.
 

Mile End Wanderer

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Messages
18,768
Reaction score
18,293
If they demolished the Steve Bull stand could they go closer to the pitch but dig down so we could have a low lower tier and curve it around to the north and south bank like Wembley??? Then put some boxes and do an upper level the further we also go back it could be a huge stand could make it the perfect one sided bowl5A88658C-590A-46D0-9120-CB7476E9A3C9.jpeg
 

beppe7619

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
394
Reaction score
271
Ive often thought recently that the mild hysteria around the Steve Bull "sinking" and about to be "condemned" was born of the Pipers Row collapse.

Having done the new Tottenham stadium tour recently, its is certainly true what others have said, the facilities at Molineux are 30 years out of date, we dont know what's in the mind of the management at the moment but they have said that it involves co-operation with the council, University and Asda . I guess the issue is when you involve three other parties you're tripling the amount of governance required to get things moving and with one party's decision probably dependent on another's with that comes a similar lengthening of time to conclude and move. Throw in a pandemic, raw material and commodity costs going through the roof, cost of living crisis for the punters who would buy the additional seats and you have to conclude that now is probably not the best time to push the button on stadium expansion. Two years time minimum I reckon before we get any news on that.
I think after the collapse concrete buildings had to be inspected and I think it stemmed from this
 

Achilles Last Stand

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Messages
699
Reaction score
1,076
This could be horsepoo... but I remember reading somewhere during the time of the Molineux rebuilding phase that either Fifa or Uefa had some new recommendations for NEW stadiums, to reserve more space for the pitch for future needs. Practically meaning that the pitch sizes could be altered, to accomodate for bigger pitches.
 

Minimalist

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
May 7, 2018
Messages
5,077
Reaction score
7,886
This could be horsepoo... but I remember reading somewhere during the time of the Molineux rebuilding phase that either Fifa or Uefa had some new recommendations for NEW stadiums, to reserve more space for the pitch for future needs. Practically meaning that the pitch sizes could be altered, to accomodate for bigger pitches.
Could be true, and I think they have indeed moved towards a standard size of pitch from what used to be a very variable set of max and min width and length.
However I’d doubt that affected us much as we used to have a bigger than average size pitch. Think MM had it shrunk a bit when he won promotion.
 

Coshamwolves

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
2,816
Reaction score
1,405
Ive often thought recently that the mild hysteria around the Steve Bull "sinking" and about to be "condemned" was born of the Pipers Row collapse.

Having done the new Tottenham stadium tour recently, its is certainly true what others have said, the facilities at Molineux are 30 years out of date, we dont know what's in the mind of the management at the moment but they have said that it involves co-operation with the council, University and Asda . I guess the issue is when you involve three other parties you're tripling the amount of governance required to get things moving and with one party's decision probably dependent on another's with that comes a similar lengthening of time to conclude and move. Throw in a pandemic, raw material and commodity costs going through the roof, cost of living crisis for the punters who would buy the additional seats and you have to conclude that now is probably not the best time to push the button on stadium expansion. Two years time minimum I reckon before we get any news on that.
Agree with all that and once any future redevelopment came under the Molineux Northern Quarter regeneration scheme it`s all got much more complex.
 

beppe7619

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
394
Reaction score
271
Agree with all that and once any future redevelopment came under the Molineux Northern Quarter regeneration scheme it`s all got much more complex.
Or do the council just want it as the university quarter. I was looking around outside molineux yesterday and the amount of buildings that have been built on the site you wonder if the council wants the ground over there. They could of geared everything up for football around the area multi story car parks access roads to the ground for away coaches from the back of the Steve bull.
 

AndyY

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
6,803
Reaction score
8,531
I'll never understand the logic in creating such vast spaces between the stands and the pitch. I just don't get why?
Wasn’t it because the SB stand was built behind the original stand and then the old stand was knocked down in front of it
 

lets all have a disco

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
8,608
Reaction score
17,457
I think after the collapse concrete buildings had to be inspected and I think it stemmed from this
It also brought in a lot of regulations with the steel reinforcements in the concrete....rules n regulations etc..... traceability of the steel...........so if there was a problem with steel reinforcements in the concrete, as in the car park you could find out where the steel had been used in other constructions.....it's the game I'm in..

If there is a problem with concrete pillars in the new uni building, behind the Steve bull stand, I could tell ya where all the steel was made in china etc etc....but don't blame me if the Steve bull stand sinks....but blame for the uni building.....
 

beppe7619

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
394
Reaction score
271
It also brought in a lot of regulations with the steel reinforcements in the concrete....rules n regulations etc..... traceability of the steel...........so if there was a problem with steel reinforcements in the concrete, as in the car park you could find out where the steel had been used in other constructions.....it's the game I'm in..

If there is a problem with concrete pillars in the new uni building, behind the Steve bull stand, I could tell ya where all the steel was made in china etc etc....but don't blame me if the Steve bull stand sinks....but blame for the uni building.....
A lot of council flat building have concrete ceilings and the cracks in there are really bad
 

lets all have a disco

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
8,608
Reaction score
17,457
A lot of council flat building have concrete ceilings and the cracks in there are really bad
Concrete cracks all the time....we do the steel reinforcements pre pouring...once they start pouring the concrete, thats their problem.......as long the steel matches up with drawings wem done ....
 

beppe7619

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
394
Reaction score
271
The above picture is the old Molineux Street which shows the John Ireland stand being built behind the Molineux Street stand.
The trolley bus use to run down molineux street. I found old clips of the mp knocking on peoples houses asking them there thoughts on moving to make way for the Steve bull stand
 

Oakhamwolf

Groupie
Joined
Sep 6, 2016
Messages
209
Reaction score
278
Wasn’t it because the SB stand was built behind the original stand and then the old stand was knocked down in front of it
Due to the state of the ground after the Taylor report, the Molineux was the first post Taylor report new build. The original report stated ambulances had to be able to drive fully around the perimeter of the pitch, and the architects took this (and a bit more to ensure they covered there arses) into account. I remember seeing an interview with Sir Jack, as the Billy Wright stand neared completion, and the front hoarding to the site were coming down, and he was not happy with the distances of the two side stands to the pitch, and even wanted to know what the builders could do to change it Lol. Obviously nothing was the answer. It was great when first built, as it was a sh*thole before, unfortunately we have paid the price of those early regs, as they were more relaxed on subsequent new builds.
 

Oakhamwolf

Groupie
Joined
Sep 6, 2016
Messages
209
Reaction score
278
Burnley now go on the list of “teams with bigger big screens than us”, which includes other illustrious clubs such as Walsall and Watford.

In fact Turf Moor inside was pretty tidy, it’s clearly had some money spent on it.

If the club won’t spend a penny on general stadium upkeep (broken TVs in the concourse, even a lick of paint) or match day experience improvements (screens), there’s no way we’re getting any new seats. There’s still bare foundations outside the Graham Hughes ffs. Where the pop-up shop used to be. Been there over a year with heras fencing around it.

Tells you all you need to know about the ownership’s commitment/willingness to invest. And that cheeky ***** Vincent will still try and jack the prices up.
They have made improvements ie 2 small screens, and new PA in 3 stands. However it’s always on the cheap, the PA company set up two displays, the one we have now ie single speakers suspended, or what are popping in most grounds that upgrade, a multiple array of speakers across a stand (array = 3 to 6 large speakers put together often with separate bass boxes), much better sound from a lot more speakers. We chose the cheap version for just 3 stands, and left the Stan Cullis ones alone, rather than a much better upgrade and the recommendation of professional sound engineers. I think this showed there intent from the off, do it when it’s broke or almost broke, and the cheapest cost. So many other grounds especially, promoted teams get a decent spruce up, the Molineux is crying out for it (appreciate some new seats and safe standing put in before I get pulled up)
 

Coshamwolves

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
2,816
Reaction score
1,405
Or do the council just want it as the university quarter. I was looking around outside molineux yesterday and the amount of buildings that have been built on the site you wonder if the council wants the ground over there. They could of geared everything up for football around the area multi story car parks access roads to the ground for away coaches from the back of the Steve bull.
That`s why i said its become much more complex
 

SingYourHeartsOut

"Its less confusing with a smaller brain"
Joined
Aug 11, 2012
Messages
38,194
Reaction score
37,023
Due to the state of the ground after the Taylor report, the Molineux was the first post Taylor report new build. The original report stated ambulances had to be able to drive fully around the perimeter of the pitch, and the architects took this (and a bit more to ensure they covered there arses) into account. I remember seeing an interview with Sir Jack, as the Billy Wright stand neared completion, and the front hoarding to the site were coming down, and he was not happy with the distances of the two side stands to the pitch, and even wanted to know what the builders could do to change it Lol. Obviously nothing was the answer. It was great when first built, as it was a sh*thole before, unfortunately we have paid the price of those early regs, as they were more relaxed on subsequent new builds.
With modern pitch technology I don't know how seriously we could look at dropping the pitch a few metres and putting 5 more rows at the front of each stand. That's potentially 4000 more seats and OK a big job, but surely cheaper than a complete SB rebuild to add the same?
 

Spitfire

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Messages
2,114
Reaction score
3,946
With modern pitch technology I don't know how seriously we could look at dropping the pitch a few metres and putting 5 more rows at the front of each stand. That's potentially 4000 more seats and OK a big job, but surely cheaper than a complete SB rebuild to add the same?
Even if technically possible it can’t happen because the pitch would end up being too short. North and South banks are already as close to the pitch as allowed.
 

Padraig

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
4,022
Reaction score
4,402
They have made improvements ie 2 small screens, and new PA in 3 stands. However it’s always on the cheap, the PA company set up two displays, the one we have now ie single speakers suspended, or what are popping in most grounds that upgrade, a multiple array of speakers across a stand (array = 3 to 6 large speakers put together often with separate bass boxes), much better sound from a lot more speakers. We chose the cheap version for just 3 stands, and left the Stan Cullis ones alone, rather than a much better upgrade and the recommendation of professional sound engineers. I think this showed there intent from the off, do it when it’s broke or almost broke, and the cheapest cost. So many other grounds especially, promoted teams get a decent spruce up, the Molineux is crying out for it (appreciate some new seats and safe standing put in before I get pulled up)
Even that was done when we were in the Championship
 

Bill S Preston Esq.

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Feb 27, 2016
Messages
11,300
Reaction score
18,235
Wasn’t it because the SB stand was built behind the original stand and then the old stand was knocked down in front of it
I can understand the necessity in doing that. I understand the poor running of the club meant that the HUGE gap remained for so long until the SJH rebuild.

What I find odd is the massive gaps (even if much smaller than the original John Ireland stand gap) utilised in the SJH rebuild. Although this may have been to do with regulations at the time.
 

Sussex Wolf

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
24,317
Reaction score
34,149
With modern pitch technology I don't know how seriously we could look at dropping the pitch a few metres and putting 5 more rows at the front of each stand. That's potentially 4000 more seats and OK a big job, but surely cheaper than a complete SB rebuild to add the same?

The new NB made it impossible without rebuilding either the North or South Bank. I remember Morgan saying at some point that they considered it when looking at different options to expand Molineux but decided against it for reasons I forget or he didn’t explain.
 

beppe7619

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
394
Reaction score
271
The new NB made it impossible without rebuilding either the North or South Bank. I remember Morgan saying at some point that they considered it when looking at different options to expand Molineux but decided against it for reasons I forget or he didn’t explain.
The north bank roof was the issue as it was a different design to the south bank making it difficult to expand which seems odd as Liverpool have built stands behind the take the old roof down
 

Sussex Wolf

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
24,317
Reaction score
34,149
I can understand the necessity in doing that. I understand the poor running of the club meant that the HUGE gap remained for so long until the SJH rebuild.

What I find odd is the massive gaps (even if much smaller than the original John Ireland stand gap) utilised in the SJH rebuild. Although this may have been to do with regulations at the time.

It’s an interesting question. SJH could have built his three stands such that the pitch was moved as close to the Steve Bull as regulations allowed, and then lined up the new North and South Banks to match, and the BW equally close on the other side. I can only imagine that they built those three stands where they are because they were required to, perhaps to allow better access around the touch lines in the event of an emergency? If so, the regulations must have changed in the intervening period to allow Morgan to push up his North Bank, and for other clubs to have new stands closer to the pitch.
 

TFWanderers

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
6,438
Reaction score
2,080
It’s an interesting question. SJH could have built his three stands such that the pitch was moved as close to the Steve Bull as regulations allowed, and then lined up the new North and South Banks to match, and the BW equally close on the other side. I can only imagine that they built those three stands where they are because they were required to, perhaps to allow better access around the touch lines in the event of an emergency? If so, the regulations must have changed in the intervening period to allow Morgan to push up his North Bank, and for other clubs to have new stands closer to the pitch.
Think of the stadiums that were built not long after Molineux.

The Reebok
Riverside
Britannia
Old Trafford refurb.
Villa Park refurb
The Hawthorns refurb
The New Den
The City Ground

I can't think of many of those stadiums where you could drive an ambulance round the pitch.

Not disputing the legislation as I have read it myself somewhere too. It must have been scrapped pretty soon after Molineux was completed in 93.
 

TFWanderers

Just doesn't shut up
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
6,438
Reaction score
2,080
They have made improvements ie 2 small screens, and new PA in 3 stands. However it’s always on the cheap, the PA company set up two displays, the one we have now ie single speakers suspended, or what are popping in most grounds that upgrade, a multiple array of speakers across a stand (array = 3 to 6 large speakers put together often with separate bass boxes), much better sound from a lot more speakers. We chose the cheap version for just 3 stands, and left the Stan Cullis ones alone, rather than a much better upgrade and the recommendation of professional sound engineers. I think this showed there intent from the off, do it when it’s broke or almost broke, and the cheapest cost. So many other grounds especially, promoted teams get a decent spruce up, the Molineux is crying out for it (appreciate some new seats and safe standing put in before I get pulled up)
I don't recall the exterior of Molineux having a spruce up since 2003. Jack had it completely refurbed on promotion to the PL.

Since then we've had the big banners added to the Billy Wright, the arrival of the new North Bank and a new shade of seat fitted in the Steve Bull lower. LED advertising boards, a new sound system and the big screens reintroduced but.....

The exterior is looking tired. The roof supports are going lighter and greener as the years roll by. Or looking at the Bully's roof, rustier. Morgan didn't bother sprucing it up as he had plans to rebuild it.

I'm not sure the current ownership do. New paint would go a long way.
 
Back
Top Bottom