BuzzWolves
Groupie
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2018
- Messages
- 339
- Reaction score
- 478
My guess is Tommy Conway. Possibly pick up for relatively cheap compared to others.
My guess is Tommy Conway. Possibly pick up for relatively cheap compared to others.
What lack of research?It’s not the lack of money it’s the lack of research that really ****es me off .
Maybe ****ed in itYou know the old glass half full/half empty analogy? Well someone has stolen his ****ing glass
Oh no. I'm absolutely gutted that I've not yet made the jump to being 'solid and worthwhile reading' for Pseudonym on Molineux Mix.
I'll keep trying. You've got a high opinion of yourself, which doesn't surprise me.
As we agreed on, everything posted on here is an opinion of a poster.
Are you going on Sunday?
No that bit was the indisputable fact part of my postYour opinion is that I have a high opinion of myself.
This is like a Christopher Nolan film
Ah yes, the same "actual fans" that were also absolutely convinced the owners were asset stripping in the summer. GON said he was disappointed a couple of our main targets fell through and you immediately pointed the finger at the owners as if it was an investment issue, despite everything that's happened over the last couple of months regarding FFP. You don't seem to learn.Despite the stick I get on here, I can see I'm not in the minority really among Wolves fans. Social media (actual fans) has many of the same concerns raised, The Wolves Forum is similar and even Keen and Judah have said similar to me, albeit not as strong, which is understandable.
Ah yes, the same "actual fans" that were also absolutely convinced the owners were asset stripping in the summer. GON said he was disappointed a couple of our main targets fell through and you immediately pointed the finger at the owners as if it was an investment issue, despite everything that's happened over the last couple of months regarding FFP. You don't seem to learn.
Ah yes, the same "actual fans" that were also absolutely convinced the owners were asset stripping in the summer. GON said he was disappointed a couple of our main targets fell through and you immediately pointed the finger at the owners as if it was an investment issue, despite everything that's happened over the last couple of months regarding FFP. You don't seem to learn.
You don't seem to read.
My main issue was letting Sasa and Silva go without replacing one of them.
I have said on multiple occasions that I was happy to do no business this month.
If we go into the final 17 games with Nathan Fraser as the only striker I absolutely will blame the owners, but it's nothing to do with investment. We could've kept Sasa and I'd have been happy with out squad. We could've loaned Brereton Diaz and I would've been happy.
So, who are the liars then? Are you suggesting he was promised a striker when he loaned out Silva and Sasa? Do you think he wasn't a part of the conversations that led to their departures?Poor Gaz doesn't realise how it works here, fell for the old trick of believing the liars.
After a rubbish day at work this has made me laugh very hard, cheers pal!!Oooo pages and pages of new posts on the transfer thread, must be a signing coming in…
Ah, no, it’s just another lengthy “present opinion as indisputable fact” tirade from WeAreTheWolvesII. Silly me.
That's what ****s me off is a player could have stayed for cover until we got someone in .You don't seem to read.
My main issue was letting Sasa and Silva go without replacing one of them.
I have said on multiple occasions that I was happy to do no business this month.
If we go into the final 17 games with Nathan Fraser as the only striker I absolutely will blame the owners, but it's nothing to do with investment. We could've kept Sasa and I'd have been happy with out squad. We could've loaned Brereton Diaz and I would've been happy.
So, who are the liars then? Are you suggesting he was promised a striker when he loaned out Silva and Sasa? Do you think he wasn't a part of the conversations that led to their departures?
Yes. I think he was told Sasa and Silva needed to go if he wanted a new striker brought in. So he agreed to that, and has then been told yesterday he won't get the big-name striker he wants. That's what I think has happened.
“The big name striker” in the January transfer window when we don’t have any money to spend and mentioned repeatedly that we’d likely only be doing loans.
What club is losing a big name striker in January without applying an absurd premium to cover their loss - an absurd premium likely in the form of an obligation. It’s not the market for us. Furthest thing from what we can accomodate right now financially. Surely you get this?
Neither Sasa or Silva were playing and it’s fairly clear GON prefers to play with out of position alternatives that can do what we wants — such is their tactical imposition on this team.
What the **** is this nonsense being posted on this thread
it’s not that it seems we won’t, he specifically says “we’re now looking at other options”I was counting Ings or Broja as the big-name striker, from O'Neil's perspective.
Have changed to first-choice to avoid confusion. But, the above point still stands. I think he agreed to let Sasa and Silva go as he was told he could get a player like Ings/Broja in (someone with experience, less of a punt). However, it now seems he won't.
Yes, hence his disappointment.it’s not that it seems we won’t, he specifically says “we’re now looking at other options”
has he said he’s disappointed?Yes, hence his disappointment.
Should I have said effective research .What lack of research?
No . The past savings make more resources available .So you don’t think the saving on wages makes a difference to who we may be able to bring in on loan ?
Yes. He used the words 'it's disappointing'.has he said he’s disappointed?
I was counting Ings or Broja as the big-name striker, from O'Neil's perspective.
Have changed to first-choice to avoid confusion. But, the above point still stands. I think he agreed to let Sasa and Silva go as he was told he could get a player like Ings/Broja in (someone with experience, less of a punt). However, it now seems he won't.
sometimes it’s a genuine question. i’ve been out all night.Yes. He used the words 'it's disappointing'.
No disrespect but you seem to imply that there was no effective research. How do you know?Should I have said effective research .
Would be a shrewd loan.
Fair enough. I do think we'll get somebody in, I just don't think we should overpay, and that's the stance I think the club is trying to take with some of these top targets. GON wants somebody to improve us, that's difficult in January.Yes. I think he was told Sasa and Silva needed to go if he wanted a new striker brought in. So he agreed to that, and has then been told yesterday he won't get the first-choice striker he wants. That's what I think has happened.
Or we've been trying to negotiate an option to buy but Chelsea are saying "no dice, minimum obligation" we obviously don't want as we're trying to turn a significant profit for this PSR period.Could it be that Chelsea's valuation of Broja is disappointing as it is somewhat high
I thought it was a young Swiss Toni.Would be a shrewd loan.
Looks like Ron Burgundy though.
On balance of probabilities, I think you are right.Yes. I think he was told Sasa and Silva needed to go if he wanted a new striker brought in. So he agreed to that, and has then been told yesterday he won't get the first-choice striker he wants. That's what I think has happened.
The club were forced into a difficult summer full of sales to turn a big profit and adhere to the Premier League’s profit and sustainability rules, with limited scope to make additions in January.
Wolves have still been prioritising signing a striker this month, however, with O’Neil keen to bolster his attacking options.
Now, after a meeting with the Wolves hierarchy on Tuesday, O’Neil has admitted the club’s ability to bring in top targets has worsened as they are priced out by parent clubs.
He said: “A lot of work was going into trying to recruit a certain type and it’s now been made clear financially that we can’t afford that type.
“So that search stops and we look at other options.
“If something comes up, which it might do, that I believe will improve us and can be done with the financial restraints we have, then we will. But at this moment, the ones we thought we could do, we can’t afford.”
O’Neil added: “The financial side of why, I’m not 100 per cent clear on. Financial fair play or the position of the club financially, but it’s just clear we still need to be very, very careful and even more careful than we thought when I spoke to you guys last week about the targets we were looking at.