WolfLing
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2016
- Messages
- 15,542
- Reaction score
- 28,288
Agree, it’s not that simple. Could argue that blatantly breaking rules is the lesser crime than seeing and acknowledging rules, then trying to subvert them, while obstructing the investigation every step of the way.
That’s what I was referring to, they’ve shocked us all by actually dishing out a proper punishment for Everton. Their breaches weren’t anywhere near as severe as Citeh’s, if take all the inflated sponsorships and related 3rd party payments away from their real bottom line.
So it should be an even greater punishment.
Yeah, it should be a greater punishment as it's not just disregarding PL rules, it's allegedly fraud.
Everton's was an open and shut case, as despite there being a dispute over the figures used in the calculations, the figure Everton put forward as their version still broke the £105m loss limit by roughly £11m. That's effectively an admission of guilt. Despite cooking the books as much as possible, they still couldn't get the figure within the limits!!
City's will be different. The PL have to prove that they have inflated sponsorship deals and revenues to pass the FFP tests. Man City won their CAS appeal from being banned from Europe on the basis that those allegations were unproven. Some charges were also time-bound, which doesn't apply to the PL, but they still have to prove what has allegedly been done.
Man City's lawyer for all this is a Lord (Lord Pannick), with a £10,000 hourly rate, being paid for by Abu-Dhabi.
I just can't see how the PL will obtain the evidence they will need to make the accusations stick.