Not sure if being ironic, as I normally agree with most your posts, but personally I struggle to think of 2 more delusional, arrogant, living in the past fanbases as Forest and Everton. I absolutely take great pleasure in their demise. Bunch of ******s the lot of them.
Lol they are delusional and arrogant, I agree. Just getting hit with two points deductions in a matter of months must be pretty **** as a fan.
Which is why they are going to face action from Leicester and others.
No one (except a few Forest and Everton fans) are saying we've breached. We sold Neves at the right time (Forest may want to look into this wizardry). A good clue is which clubs have recently hired very expensive lawyers (it's not us).
Full coverage outside the courts!! Harry Redknapp was once here over his little dog pickles now the ante has been upped by these over spending clubs. Cutting edge reporting here Jeff
www.forestforum.co.uk
I’m 50/50 on it with him. On one hand he’s a legend to me but on the other he knew what he was going into and he’s very much part of what Mendes does and looks increasingly like a bit of a lap dog.
And another 10 for a failed, futile appeal. If they also do that with this second deduction, then they'll be 12 points adrift of Sheffield United on - 3pts.
I'd dock them ten points for that shine so brightly song.
Part of that is easy to answer- they had a scatter gun approach to transfers and brought god knows how many.
I feel for the fans of any club that went down as a result of Everton’s consistent over spending
First season up 195m signed sold 78m Nottingham Forest - Transfers 22/23
Agreed. Essentially Everton and Forest have had an unfair advantage
If there were only going to breach slightly then they would have simply sold a player or two to olympiakos. The fact they didnt suggest their breach is likely to be a big number
Are Chelsea in the clear? They seemed to always be buying players or have the sales helped to keep them in line?
The purchases will be spread across the length of the contracts. The issue for them is they are allowed much smaller losses due to 2 years in the championshipFirst season up 195m signed sold 78m Nottingham Forest - Transfers 22/23
=117m net spend
This season 122m signed, sold 70m
Nottingham Forest - Transfers 23/24
Transfers: Overview of all signed and sold players of club Nottm Forest for the current season.www.transfermarkt.co.uk
=52m net spend that’s including beyond the cut off date
That’s without ridiculous wages……
Therefore in 2 seasons alone they’ve breached a 3 year ruling!! Net £169m They have failed the rules big time
Has he had a Lopetegui/fosun situation where they had convinced him they were in no danger of breaching ffp. Wonder if Nuno could walk if thats the situation.
No idea mate. I think they sold £140m quids worth during the summer though
The €75m last season is Transfermarkt's market value of the players that departed; Forest only brought in €5m from Brice Samba and 15 players worth of loan fees.First season up 195m signed sold 78m Nottingham Forest - Transfers 22/23
=117m net spend
This season 122m signed, sold 70m
Nottingham Forest - Transfers 23/24
Transfers: Overview of all signed and sold players of club Nottm Forest for the current season.
=52m net spend that’s including beyond the cut off date
That’s without ridiculous wages……
Therefore in 2 seasons alone they’ve breached a 3 year ruling!! Net £169m They have failed the rules big time
First season up 195m signed sold 78m Nottingham Forest - Transfers 22/23
=117m net spend
This season 122m signed, sold 70m
Nottingham Forest - Transfers 23/24
Transfers: Overview of all signed and sold players of club Nottm Forest for the current season.
=52m net spend that’s including beyond the cut off date
That’s without ridiculous wages……
Therefore in 2 seasons alone they’ve breached a 3 year ruling!! Net £169m They have failed the rules big time
Isn’t it 90m? Lol
