I’m no expert on FFP but know that it works on a rolling 3 years basis. So, Anything that impacts our bottom line this year provides extra spending power next year.If we sell Kilman for £40m in this window, can that money count to income for summer purchases for FFP purposes? Or would there be an onus on us to spend it in this FFP window (i.e. immediately)? If the latter, we're going to get rinsed by any club we want to buy from.
FFP works in rolling three year cycles. I think it's £105m permitted losses accumulated over those three seasons.If we sell Kilman for £40m in this window, can that money count to income for summer purchases for FFP purposes? Or would there be an onus on us to spend it in this FFP window (i.e. immediately)? If the latter, we're going to get rinsed by any club we want to buy from.
Only if the owner invests, otherwise its £15m accumulated over 3 seasonsFFP works in rolling three year cycles. I think it's £105m permitted losses accumulated over those three seasons.
Yeh he did stand out, him and Doue were phenomenal. Actually really surprised to see that Doue has only started 5 games for them this season, he looks like a really special talent.
Almost unfathomable that a Premier League owner wouldn't invest though, in this day and age. Not saying it couldn't happen, but owners will do whatever they can to retain their status in a multi-billion pound league. The loss of Premier League status is far more costly than not covering £90m losses over three years!Only if the owner invests, otherwise its £15m accumulated over 3 seasons
Hugo Ekitike: What Paris Saint-Germain Can Expect From Their New Signing
Just been looking at the video footage of Ekitike…can’t say it’s convincing. This scout report sums up what I was thinking.
For those who would quite happily see Kilman sold becasue they dont rate him think about what would happen without him. He may not appear to be the great centre back but if he unites the team together and his absence would negatively upset the balance of the team then he needs to stay. Only when we feel he can be taken out of the side without worsening it should we even think about it.What signal does it send out if we sell our captain? We should not sell Kilman a left footed CB is worth double, I’d be well cheesed off if we sold him.
How on earth did we manage before we had emoji's?Someone wrote come to wolves on his Instagram and he responded with a heart emoji so that’s that.
Sale imminent then
Cundle recalled
Sale imminent then
Don’t think he ever would unfortunately, we’re a level above. A decent sale of £2-3m+ would be ideal and allow us to spend a little this year given amortised costs.Sad, I really like Cundlinho but he never doesn’t break into this Prem Team for several years at best.
Might be paying for the loan fee on our loan to buy striker.Sale imminent then
Guarantee of playing more?Strange though, why recall him to only then loan him to another Championship club?
Plymouth manager went to Stoke so it adds up.Guarantee of playing more?
PigeonHow on earth did we manage before we had emoji's?
Good spotPlymouth manager went to Stoke so it adds up.
100% liam keen said no option.Plymouth manager went to Stoke so it adds up.
That I would not like to see unless the option is a lot higher than tjhe fee mentioned. Just a loan allows us to retain advantage for any deal whereas an option allows the other team to dictate at a low fee or if they dont want him to walk away.Maybe there’s an option with the loan?
No optionMaybe there’s an option with the loan?
The only clubs with money aren’t showing interest in him.That I would not like to see unless the option is a lot higher than tjhe fee mentioned. Just a loan allows us to retain advantage for any deal whereas an option allows the other team to dictate at a low fee or if they dont want him to walk away.
Why have we recalled Cundle and sent him to Stoke? Any ideas?