VancouverWolf
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2018
- Messages
- 20,042
- Reaction score
- 18,086
Was the Wolves woman who hit a West Hm fan with a pie given a lifetime ban?
Wrong but not the same analogyWas the Wolves woman who hit a West Hm fan with a pie given a lifetime ban?
It’s about accountability and proportional response and punishmentWrong but not the same analogy
I agree but hurling a pie isn’t in the same as hurling racist and homophobic abuseIt’s about accountability and proportional response and punishment
Is "village idiots" acceptable nowadays?Village idiots in the old days had smaller ponds to swim in.
Sticks and stones may break my bones but pies will never hurt me...I agree but hurling a pie isn’t in the same as hurling racist and homophobic abuse
What if the thrown pie hit a person who was Vegan? Would it be classed as a hate crime?I agree but hurling a pie isn’t in the same as hurling racist and homophobic abuse
or a stale pork pie,but red hot pie in the eye could be serious but magistrates would take that into considerationI guess hurling a pie if it was red hot could actually injure someone? Just saying.
Yes but which flavour would be most painful?I guess hurling a pie if it was red hot could actually injure someone? Just saying.
It could be worse if it’s red hot liquid inside comes into contact with the eyeI agree but hurling a pie isn’t in the same as hurling racist and homophobic abuse
In modern society, there's simply no place for vigilante/mob rule.Forget the courts, they should put him in a room with Rio and make him repeat what he said and let Rio beat the ignorance out of him. An eye for an eye and all that.
In modern society there’s simply no place for racism, homophobia or discrimination of any sort.
Cue the "I wouldn't behave like that normally when l'm sober, l can't believe that l did it" type comments when he's convicted and sent down...I’m generally quite a forgiving person and think people deserve a second chance, but what really winds me up is him denying his actions.
If morons want to behave like this, at least have the courage to admit what you’ve done.
No doubt, he’ll plead not guilty to the Rio Ferdinand related charges, wasting everybody’s precious time.
I agree completely. However as I commented above, given what he’s accused of, if he ends up in jail he may get some mob justice inside whether it’s right or wrong.In modern society, there's simply no place for vigilante/mob rule.
Thankfully there are courts and penalties proscribed for offenders to societies rules.
You only have to read this thread to see what would happen if penalties were decided by the general public while emotions are high.
In principle l agree. Whether economic arguments mean that penalties are currently set too low is a whole other debate.In modern society, there's simply no place for vigilante/mob rule.
Thankfully there are courts and penalties proscribed for offenders to societies rules.
You only have to read this thread to see what would happen if penalties were decided by the general public while emotions are high.
SortedBanned indefinitely say Wolves. Thought this was a good article.
Wolves thank fans after hate crime conviction
Wolves have thanked the supporters that witnessed, reported and provided statements of discriminatory abuse, which led to the conviction of a supporter...www.wolves.co.uk
Good riddance to bad rubbish. Just need him to go down for a couple of years when he's tried next year for the Ferdinand incident now....Banned indefinitely say Wolves. Thought this was a good article.
Wolves thank fans after hate crime conviction
Wolves have thanked the supporters that witnessed, reported and provided statements of discriminatory abuse, which led to the conviction of a supporter...www.wolves.co.uk
Jonzy that is an amazing response. The potential to blind someone, knock them off balance and cause physical damage to them - and potentially others, as well as the shock factor of an unexpected impact is, according to your response, less of an upset than a few words intended as an insult.I agree but hurling a pie isn’t in the same as hurling racist and homophobic abuse
It certainly didn’t do Ernie any goodor a stale pork pie,but red hot pie in the eye could be serious but magistrates would take that into consideration
along with relevant factors
behaviour at grounds is now a lot better than when quite often you had to fight to get into
and out of grounds in the 60s/70s/80s
Ended his milkcart driving career....It certainly didn’t do Ernie any good
Yes I do acknowledge being hit by a pie isn’t pleasant.I can personally vouch for this at Burnley a few years ago when their fans thought it was a good idea to bombard the Wolves fans with pies and I too got hit .Jonzy that is an amazing response. The potential to blind someone, knock them off balance and cause physical damage to them - and potentially others, as well as the shock factor of an unexpected impact is, according to your response, less of an upset than a few words intended as an insult.
I can only say you can hurl all the insults at me you so wish, but from that I would not wish you to assume I would prefer a pie to be hurled at me, because I am not stark staring bonkers.
You might find my preferences to be a viewpoint held by the vast majority of people.
100% Cuckoo.It could be worse if it’s red hot liquid inside comes into contact with the eye
She got 3 year ban, appealed it and it was rejected
Yes I do acknowledge being hit by a pie isn’t pleasant.I can personally vouch for this at Burnley a few years ago when their fans thought it was a good idea to bombard the Wolves fans with pies and I too got hit .
My point was really aimed at the modern trend of people thinking they can say /type what they like and get away with it and was probably not the best comparison.
Fair enough, and as we do live in a rapidly changing world not all judgements are going to sit easily with one another. As an aside, an article just flagged up on my screen, via my IP, suggests false Covid vaccine information, deliberately spread, should be classed a criminal offence. I can appreciate the exasperation behind the sentiments, but I can also imagine many a legal beagle rubbing their hands at the prospect.Yes I do acknowledge being hit by a pie isn’t pleasant.I can personally vouch for this at Burnley a few years ago when their fans thought it was a good idea to bombard the Wolves fans with pies and I too got hit .
My point was really aimed at the modern trend of people thinking they can say /type what they like and get away with it and was probably not the best comparison.
gone a bit daft in the head ay they,they used to throw darts at ya in the
Had ‘brown stuff’ chucked at us at Millwall back in the 70’s-delightfulgone a bit daft in the head ay they,they used to throw darts at ya in the 70s.
gone a bit daft in the head ay they,they used to throw darts at ya in the
Had ‘brown stuff’ chucked at us at Millwall back in the 70’s-delightfulgone a bit daft in the head ay they,they used to throw darts at ya in the 70s.
Of course it does. But then the thread title and newspaper headlines don't have to be so "click baity" or misleading.Fair point, but when you take into account the alleged racial abuse of Rio, if also found guilty, then surely it demonstrates what type of person we're talking about?
It's a view shared by me. And I've been racially *abused*.Jonzy that is an amazing response. The potential to blind someone, knock them off balance and cause physical damage to them - and potentially others, as well as the shock factor of an unexpected impact is, according to your response, less of an upset than a few words intended as an insult.
I can only say you can hurl all the insults at me you so wish, but from that I would not wish you to assume I would prefer a pie to be hurled at me, because I am not stark staring bonkers.
You might find my preferences to be a viewpoint held by the vast majority of people.
Assuming the ticket will be in south bankAssuming the season ticket waiting list has gone down by 1 and there is a lucky recipient of this guys season ticket…..
If I had the ability to give likes/ leave emoji’s I’d give you a laughing face emoji for this.Assuming the ticket will be in south bank
But it’s not just that is it. What may be ‘just an insult’ to you can mean something completely different to someone else. Insults based on colour, and gender etc have the ability to wreck someone’s life and make them feel claustrophobic, trapped, anxious, alienated and depressed and in some cases worse. Can a smack in the mouth do that? Being homophobic or racist isn’t sticks and stones, but is in fact abusing someone for something they can do absolutely nothing about, whether it be Rio Ferdinand, the ref, another fan, your next door neighbour or anyone else. And as regards your last sentence - I take it you’re joking right?Jonzy that is an amazing response. The potential to blind someone, knock them off balance and cause physical damage to them - and potentially others, as well as the shock factor of an unexpected impact is, according to your response, less of an upset than a few words intended as an insult.
I can only say you can hurl all the insults at me you so wish, but from that I would not wish you to assume I would prefer a pie to be hurled at me, because I am not stark staring bonkers.
You might find my preferences to be a viewpoint held by the vast majority of people.
You’ve got that wrong. It doesn’t matter who he aims the comments at, anybody can take offence at it and report it as a hate incident even if they’re not the recipient of the said derogative terms. In essence a third party can take offence.I do get it. I get that he's used derogatory terms for disabled/gay and directed them at someone who is neither disabled or gay.
Which is completely different to hurling the same words at the disabled section at Molineux or a couple of lads holding hands outside a gay bar.
One could be described as a hate crime, but not the other.
You're wrong. Research the law, I did. I'm correct.You’ve got that wrong. It doesn’t matter who he aims the comments at, anybody can take offence at it and report it as a hate incident even if they’re not the recipient of the said derogative terms. In essence a third party can take offence.
Can you please tell me which part of my statement you think is wrong, then I can respond accordingly. Thanks.You're wrong. Research the law, I did. I'm correct.