T
Taipeiwolf
Guest
A lot has been said about the Roger Johnson captain clause and I was thinking that if true then Mick must have agreed to it before signing him.
If that was the case then to avoid the dressing room spats that seem to have been the cause of this season's abortion, shouldn't Mick have moved on Karl Henry to give his new captain a clean slate?
Think about it. Top managers are ruthless sometimes move even their top players on when they become a problem. Think Alex Ferguson and Beckham. There must be other examples....
So, was Mick too nice to succeed at the top???
Not trying to be controversial , but was just thinking if anyone agrees with this...
If that was the case then to avoid the dressing room spats that seem to have been the cause of this season's abortion, shouldn't Mick have moved on Karl Henry to give his new captain a clean slate?
Think about it. Top managers are ruthless sometimes move even their top players on when they become a problem. Think Alex Ferguson and Beckham. There must be other examples....
So, was Mick too nice to succeed at the top???
Not trying to be controversial , but was just thinking if anyone agrees with this...