SteveBullsKnee
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2015
- Messages
- 13,311
- Reaction score
- 28,997
When you are that good you are allowed to have an ego. Nobody ever moaned about Best's ego or Maradona'sultimate ego to go with it
When you are that good you are allowed to have an ego. Nobody ever moaned about Best's ego or Maradona'sultimate ego to go with it
I think they exaggerate. It was nothing like the weight of a medicine ball. As a kid playing schools football in the 50s, I remember the old leather case-balls we played with being hard to kick long distances, especially when they were wet. The older the ball, the more it tended to absorb water. But the professional game obviously started every match with a brand new top of the range leather job, , and it at least started the game with a shiny protective coating, a bit like a new cricket ball. Whatever the case, professional footballers had no difficulty launching it when they needed to!Whenever you speak to people of a certain vintage its the first thing out the mouth "was like a medicine ball when it was wet, not like this balls floating around now" so logically the modern goalkeeper has a more difficult job with a ball that moves more and quicker.
who`s moaning,it`s just a factWhen you are that good you are allowed to have an ego. Nobody ever moaned about Best's ego or Maradona's
Think we won't agree on this. I remember him from mid 60s onwards and the folly of relative youth means that my memories of him might be wrong but strong nonetheless. But still think he was better than many rememberParkes was avarage at best... I spent the mid to late 70's behind the goal at the front of the North Bank. Never once was I confident with him between the sticks. Always had a face palm moment in him... Saw him sat back on the ball once, with his **** giving the momentum to it to cross the line... Even I spat my Bovril out at that one.
Back in the day they would have needed heavier, stronger, footwear than they use now.I think they exaggerate. It was nothing like the weight of a medicine ball. As a kid playing schools football in the 50s, I remember the old leather case-balls we played with being hard to kick long distances, especially when they were wet. The older the ball, the more it tended to absorb water. But the professional game obviously started every match with a brand new top of the range leather job, , and it at least started the game with a shiny protective coating, a bit like a new cricket ball. Whatever the case, professional footballers had no difficulty launching it when they needed to!
Made too many daft mistakes for me. Could be brilliant on his day, but guilty of too many howlers. The one I quite liked was Dave McLaren, unspectacular but very solid. Boswell probably the worst I have ever seen. In that 0-6 v Liverpool he was at fault for 5 of the goals. I think that defeat was what caused Ronnie Allen to get the sack, IIRC. Pity, as he was a bloody good manager.Think we won't agree on this. I remember him from mid 60s onwards and the folly of relative youth means that my memories of him might be wrong but strong nonetheless. But still think he was better than many remember
Is it pure coincidence that during Rui's inconsistent season he's got really poor stats?Rui is a great keeper who has had an inconsistent seqson. Xg is a pile of *******s. Stat's are a load of *******s, you can twist them too easily. The end.
as I said should have signed banks might just have won the leagueMade too many daft mistakes for me. Could be brilliant on his day, but guilty of too many howlers. The one I quite liked was Dave McLaren, unspectacular but very solid. Boswell probably the worst I have ever seen. In that 0-6 v Liverpool he was at fault for 5 of the goals. I think that defeat was what caused Rinnie Allen to get the sack, IIRC. Pity, as he was a bloody good manager.
Yes, of course, just take a look at the team photos of the 40s and 50s. The old boots were always brown leather, and you needed to apply 'Dubbin' regularly to keep the leather supple and keep them from absorbing water. By the 60s the balls were a lot lighter and the boots more like what we have todayBack in the day they would have needed heavier, stronger, footwear than they use now.
Keep going mate. Too many innumerates on here. My background is not science and maths at all, but I was forced to learn basic statistical methods later in life and it really opened my eyes. Blaming statistics is like blaming VAR -- they can both be properly applied or completely misapplied, but that's the fault of the statistician and the VAR referee, not the science of statistics or VAR!Is it pure coincidence that during Rui's inconsistent season he's got really poor stats?
Exactly what is being twisted? Stats are stats, how they're used is up for debate, but statistics are the closest thing we have to an unbiased view of events.
What surprised me was that Boswell (yes, I still have nightmares of the 0-6 defeat) warmed up at the side of the pitch not between the posts. Not significant perhaps but not seen it before or since. He also seemed a slightly frail GK. Ronnie Allen would have been an excellent manager I think; he built an exciting team in his short stay here and signed players who became legends - the Doog , Mike Bailey etc.Made too many daft mistakes for me. Could be brilliant on his day, but guilty of too many howlers. The one I quite liked was Dave McLaren, unspectacular but very solid. Boswell probably the worst I have ever seen. In that 0-6 v Liverpool he was at fault for 5 of the goals. I think that defeat was what caused Ronnie Allen to get the sack, IIRC. Pity, as he was a bloody good manager.
To be fair, I was only witnessing at the end of his career... I was a lot happier when Bradshaw had the gloves on.Think we won't agree on this. I remember him from mid 60s onwards and the folly of relative youth means that my memories of him might be wrong but strong nonetheless. But still think he was better than many remember
You should read the drunkards walk, it really opened my eyes around how probability affects us and how likely events are to happen.Keep going mate. Too many innumerates on here. My background is not science and maths at all, but I was forced to learn basic statistical methods later in life and it really opened my eyes. Blaming statistics is like blaming VAR -- they can both be properly applied or completely misapplied, but that's the fault of the statistician and the VAR referee, not the science of statistics or VAR!
you are more likely to be struck by lightening on a golf course then be attacked by a shark.You should read the drunkards walk, it really opened my eyes around how probability affects us and how likely events are to happen.
Obviously- and one that’s chopping and changing every week. He’s trying to cover for others inadequacy as well as doing his own job.Or playing behind a very poor defence?
Statistics say what has happened, but nothing about why. (I know there’s correlation and so on but non-parametric correlation between, say, Coady being low on confidence and Rui deciding to punch rather than catch, are very difficult to do.Is it pure coincidence that during Rui's inconsistent season he's got really poor stats?
Exactly what is being twisted? Stats are stats, how they're used is up for debate, but statistics are the closest thing we have to an unbiased view of events.
Is it pure coincidence that during Rui's inconsistent season he's got really poor stats?
Exactly what is being twisted? Stats are stats, how they're used is up for debate, but statistics are the closest thing we have to an unbiased view of events.
That's the same for all keepers, no? Remember this isn't looking at Ruis stats in isolation, it's comparing Rui to all other keepers in the league. Provided the data is gathered consistently then it's a fair way to evaluate.I dont really think they are unbiased tbh because you dont get the entire picture. There is just so many variables and and things you just cant see. For example, what if a shot takes a slight deflection and that contributes to an error?
Its just become a modern day thing in football, like this xg cobblers. Means absolutely nothing in the scheme of things.
Rui has been poor this season, he has cost us goals. That's a fact. (Newcastle, Spurs, near post Vs Liverpool & West Ham).Statistics say what has happened, but nothing about why. (I know there’s correlation and so on but non-parametric correlation between, say, Coady being low on confidence and Rui deciding to punch rather than catch, are very difficult to do.
Rui having poor statistics says nothing about why that is. If we had a premier league defence we would have a world class Keeper again.
there are at least 7 players in this team that need upgrading before Rui so why don’t we all do our best to ensure he goes back to sporting on a free?
talk about cutting your noses off to spite your faces!
Same weight (14-16 oz) since before the start of the league, which is quite surprising if you think about it. However in wet conditions the pre-60's balls took on a lot of water.It’s one of the biggest myths in football that the ball was loads heavier in the 40s/50s.
Yeah, it's structured subjectivity. All stats are at some level! Is a successful pass one where a teammate touches the ball first? Or does the teammate have to control the ball? What if the teammate is fouled for a penalty before they get to it? What if a teammate does receive it, but it puts them in jeopardy or forces them wide?"The quality of shots". How exactly is that defined and decided? At best it's structured subjectivity, at worst total BS.
TY for the explanation. My first degree is maths, stats and computing and my masters Operational Research so l understand the principles well enough but not the detail in this case.Yeah, it's structured subjectivity. All stats are at some level! Is a successful pass one where a teammate touches the ball first? Or does the teammate have to control the ball? What if the teammate is fouled for a penalty before they get to it? What if a teammate does receive it, but it puts them in jeopardy or forces them wide?
So it shouldn't be seen as absolute, but I think it's a useful metric.
That is true in fairness.Same weight (14-16 oz) since before the start of the league, which is quite surprising if you think about it. However in wet conditions the pre-60's balls took on a lot of water.
Your correct the weight was the same when dry,but the 50s balls hadnt got the plastic coatings they have now and when wet probably weighed more than twice thatIt’s one of the biggest myths in football that the ball was loads heavier in the 40s/50s.
It's utter cobblers.That's the same for all keepers, no? Remember this isn't looking at Ruis stats in isolation, it's comparing Rui to all other keepers in the league. Provided the data is gathered consistently then it's a fair way to evaluate.
Coupled with my own thoughts that Rui has made some basic mistakes this season (Newcastle and Spurs spring to mind). Also, Martinez at villa has been excellent which is also shown in the data suggests it's not cobblers.
Well, that's me convinced.It's utter cobblers.
You know it makes senseWell, that's me convinced.