Timberwolf
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2005
- Messages
- 11,017
- Reaction score
- 9,761
With the coming anniversary of the Munich disaster, I've read a lot in the national press, forums and social media which discuss with near reverence the Busby Babes. The disaster itself is undisputed tragedy and when you think the pilot didn't abort after two failed attempts, the loss of life seems so avoidable.
However, this isn't a discussion of the tragedy. My question is 'would Wolves have been champions in 57-58 & 58-59 had it not been for the tragedy?'
Man Utd had won the League the previous two seasons but in the 52/53, 53/54, 54/55 and 55/56 seasons Wolves had finished 3rd, 1st, 2nd and 3rd respectively. Also, in 59/60 and 60/61, we finished 2nd and 3rd. That's not to dismiss Wolves' efforts immediately pre and post war era's where our league position closely matches United. Therefore, one could argue that without the tragedy occurring, Wolves had the pedigree to have beaten Man Utd to the Championship anyway.
Which brings me onto my next question, 'Do you think the disaster harmed us as a club?' It seems as I read football fan comments and the Manc love-in in the press, that a lot of opinion is definitely made through Red tinted spectacles. It was Matt Busby that pushed for European Football and Stan Cullis gets forgotten. The Busby babes were the 'greatest', forgetting Wolves own team of superstars including Billy Wright, the then England captain. Had the disaster not happened, would it be fair to say that history would've viewed the Wolves team of the fifties, more favourable than the United side? Would we be the team with an 80'000 seater stadium and be the richest club in the world?
As I said, I am not in any way dismissing the tragic circumstances of the air disaster. This is purely a discussion from a football and public perception point of view.
However, this isn't a discussion of the tragedy. My question is 'would Wolves have been champions in 57-58 & 58-59 had it not been for the tragedy?'
Man Utd had won the League the previous two seasons but in the 52/53, 53/54, 54/55 and 55/56 seasons Wolves had finished 3rd, 1st, 2nd and 3rd respectively. Also, in 59/60 and 60/61, we finished 2nd and 3rd. That's not to dismiss Wolves' efforts immediately pre and post war era's where our league position closely matches United. Therefore, one could argue that without the tragedy occurring, Wolves had the pedigree to have beaten Man Utd to the Championship anyway.
Which brings me onto my next question, 'Do you think the disaster harmed us as a club?' It seems as I read football fan comments and the Manc love-in in the press, that a lot of opinion is definitely made through Red tinted spectacles. It was Matt Busby that pushed for European Football and Stan Cullis gets forgotten. The Busby babes were the 'greatest', forgetting Wolves own team of superstars including Billy Wright, the then England captain. Had the disaster not happened, would it be fair to say that history would've viewed the Wolves team of the fifties, more favourable than the United side? Would we be the team with an 80'000 seater stadium and be the richest club in the world?
As I said, I am not in any way dismissing the tragic circumstances of the air disaster. This is purely a discussion from a football and public perception point of view.