Disagree all you want. Thats your opinion
I have been watching Wolves for donkeys and in my opinion he is the best manager I have seen. First was Bill McGarry by the way
See what you did there
Disagree all you want. Thats your opinion
I have been watching Wolves for donkeys and in my opinion he is the best manager I have seen. First was Bill McGarry by the way
Disagree all you want. Thats your opinion
I have been watching Wolves for donkeys and in my opinion he is the best manager I have seen. First was Bill McGarry by the way
Graham Turner did a lot for Wolves but he's similar to McCarthy in that he'd taken the club as far as he possibly could.
They were both limited managers who did excellently with small budgets but had significantly poorer records when they had money to spend.
I hope he gets one as I'd like him to do well. He wont ever be in Bill McGarry's league but hes the best we've had since BM thats for sure!
John Barnwell?? If only he headn't had that car crash or let Richie Barker loose on the team
John Barnwell?? If only he headn't had that car crash or let Richie Barker loose on the team
Fair point but one we'll never know due to the car crash- and Richie Barker was another second in command who couldn't quite make the step up.
pretty much agree with that. Both had excellent records at signing players for next to nothing (bull, thompson, downing and venus for turner, henry, ward, kightly and jarvis for mccarthy).
I'd also argue that they both brought well when allowed to spend comparatively large amounts of money as well (thomas and kelly for turner, doyle and fletcher for mccarthy).
Where both struggled was in that 'in between' market (ashley and blades for turner, maierhofer (sorry mugwump), halford, eastwood et al for mccarthy).
I think that generally, there are a lot of comparisons between the two managers. Both thoroughly decent men who did fantastic jobs for us in extremely difficult (if very different) circumstances. Easily the two favourite managers of my 25 years supporting wolves.