The House of Wolves
Has a lot to say
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2017
- Messages
- 1,172
- Reaction score
- 2,100
I fall more and more out of love with this sport every week.
VAR has killed it because it fixes nothing.He waited and wanted to give it. Football is becoming a bit pointless really.
THISFrom that angle it looks like a pen. So will VAR look at the other one that shows he got ball first? No, course not.
YesSa ever saved a penalty??? Not that it matters.
Another corrupt decision. Clearly want foolham to win. How dare we beat spurs
He should be embarrassed about how bad that was.Cairney diving
Clumsy? Then it's always clumsy if you get the ball first because you can't possibly control where your foot goes after that.We’d be howling if that decision was not given to us. Clumsy challenge from semedo.
Mate,I think you need glasses,how the **** was that a pen when he got the ball? They kept showing the same replay where it looked like it was,where as the other one showed him getting the ballThis is truly the wolves way - beat spurs and then lose to a team below us. Was a penalty though, Semedo and Lemina both at fault there.
No English officials have killed it. Now getting the ball isn’t ’clear and obvious’.VAR has killed it because it fixes nothing.
If the ref calls that and there's no VAR, we're mad but it is what it is.
But with VAR you would think things should be right 99.5% of the time and it's clearly not.
and it’s why i would scrap it.VAR has killed it because it fixes nothing.
If the ref calls that and there's no VAR, we're mad but it is what it is.
But with VAR you would think things should be right 99.5% of the time and it's clearly not.
Is he on VAR duties, too?Semedo you ****ing clown
It was ridiculous defending, was only ever resulting in a penalty shout.He got the ball and the refs give everything against us. No need to bash him for that.
It's very clear he got the ball. I just don't know what the point of VAR is, but Wolves consistently getting shafted is getting so old.We’d be howling if that decision was not given to us. Clumsy challenge from semedo.
VAR finding that angle to prove the ref right again. Ignoring the bit where he gets the ball
It's nothing but a total cop out!!!Get shut of the clear and obvious *******s
and it’s why i would scrap it.
it’s very very very soft. but under current guidelines… which is the problem.
You can stick your boring multi paragraphed posts up your ****So whose fault is that that HE lunged and tripped the player up?
Jesus some people on here excuse every mistake the useless ******* makes!
He is a liability, if any of the rumours are true someone wants to buy him snap their ****ing hands off and get rid!
Clumsy? Then it's always clumsy if you get the ball first because you can't possibly control where your foot goes after that.
How did he get the ball? One replay showed slight contact perhaps with a bit of the ball, but he hardly ‘got it’.It's very clear he got the ball. I just don't know what the point of VAR is, but Wolves consistently getting shafted is getting so hold.
I’m not convinced he did get the ball tbh. If he did, it was wasn’t enough to change the fact the Fulham player was after it and Semedo prevented that from happening. Poor effort from Semedo tbh, giving the ref a decision to make is also a stupid thing to do.Mate,I think you need glasses,how the **** was that a pen when he got the ball? They kept showing the same replay where it looked like it was,where as the other one showed him getting the ball
Always has been…..They make it up as they go along. Semedo gets a slight nudge on the ball *then* the attacker falls over Semedo's leg. It's absurd. I said on the VAR thread, it's all about being the most convincing cheat these days.
There you go…This is 2023. It more likely will depend on who gets the VAR decision.