Wonder Boyo
Yma O Hyd
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2005
- Messages
- 11,256
- Reaction score
- 25,856
Why would you take the xG stats of the most attacking player from the rest of team to prove a point? He's part of the team and tactics, without him it's the xG of a 10 man team. It's like Man City fans taking Haaland's stats out if their xG and Arsenal taking Jesus's xG stats out to say they're not as effective without one of their main attacking players. No **** Sherlock.Unfortunately I can't subscribe to the "a win is all that matters" school of thought
Two very poor teams, with Infogol giving xG of Wolves 1.24 - 1.42 Forest
Strip out the 0.8 for the penalty and that means Wolves created 0.44 against a very bad Forest side
Strip out the chances created and shots by Adama Traore and the xG from the rest of the team was 0.14
I'd agree our overall xG isn't very good though. However, I'm really struggling work out how Forest had a higher xG than us. Kilman hit the inside of the post from the 6 yard line and we had numerous opportunities in the first half from close range. Only real chance I can remember that Forest had, apart from the penalty, was the header from the corner in the second half.