D
Deleted member 8455jwf
Guest
Apparently they want that Matheus NunesOne positive at least Man City wont be chasing Neves in the summer now lol
Apparently they want that Matheus NunesOne positive at least Man City wont be chasing Neves in the summer now lol
Not when it's man city.I think that once you start accepting that a team should beat you by 5 (which should’ve been 10) that’s a serious problem, and indicative of far wider issues at the club.
True. Many are yet again looking at the ref for our performance being start it was. Just look at but closer to home...."Interesting" is not the word many of us would choose.....
I don't think they are. It's tough enough playing Man City but then factor in the dire performance of that **** ref and you have no chance. It's like playing against 12 men. He gave us nothing and missed 2 pens and numerous fouls.True. Many are yet again looking at the ref for our performance being start it was. Just look at but closer to home....
We were beating City 2 seasons ago…Not when it's man city.
And losing to huddersfield.We were beating City 2 seasons ago…
City have just beaten on of the form teams in the prem 5-1 before playing us. Their champions league exit has lit a fire under them. We caught them at a bad time.We were beating City 2 seasons ago…
They weren't two pens though.I don't think they are. It's tough enough playing Man City but then factor in the dire performance of that **** ref and you have no chance. It's like playing against 12 men. He gave us nothing and missed 2 pens and numerous fouls.
Absolute dog **** performance from the official.
And they caught us at a very good time!City have just beaten on of the form teams in the prem 5-1 before playing us. Their champions league exit has lit a fire under them. We caught them at a bad time.
I think that once you start accepting that a team should beat you by 5 (which should’ve been 10) that’s a serious problem, and indicative of far wider issues at the club.
We were beating City 2 seasons ago…
And an 'on fire' AdamaWhen De Bruyne was either absent or far from full fit. And they had 10 men for most the match. And we had Jota and a pre-injury Raul.
Yes - the key word in my statement is ‘should’. Look at the West Ham the week after.If you can't accept being beaten by 4, then best support a Big Club like Bayern or Liverpool. And even they get beaten by 4 every few years! It's a fact of footballing life. Some you win, some you lose. Only a handful of clubs win anything. Its' as far from a level playing field as you can get.
I don't think anybody is saying they "should" beat us by 5 - but that we accept that if we are going to lose 5-1 to anyone, City are that team. Not Burnley or West Ham, for example.
And an 'on fire' Adamai
programme has it as 30,914Anyone know the attendance for this game? I can't find anything on't web
I must have dreamt that his save pushed the ball out to the scorer for their second goal then....another 2 fun facts from the game;
we had 43% of our shots on target,Man.C. only 33%
Sa didn`t make a save,
take it up with fbref!I must have dreamt that his save pushed the ball out to the scorer for their second goal then....