Spitfire
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
- Messages
- 2,102
- Reaction score
- 3,912
Palace at home last season?Was Forest at home the last time we got a penalty in the league btw?
Palace at home last season?Was Forest at home the last time we got a penalty in the league btw?
Nah. Dawson was trying to get away from him. Actually put his arms in the air so he wasn't touching Mc**** but Mc**** had his arms round him and was trying to block him off. Constantly.I think there was a bit of 6 of one half a dozen of the other
That’s how it started but Dawson, the wily old veteran, soon realised that running in to McGinn and going down would put the ref under pressure to either book him or award a penalty.Nah. Dawson was trying to get away from him. Actually put his arms in the air so he wasn't touching Mc**** but Mc**** had his arms round him and was trying to block him off. Constantly.
You must have been watching a different match fella.That’s how it started but Dawson, the wily old veteran, soon realised that running in to McGinn and going down would put the ref under pressure to either book him or award a penalty.
He also didn't give it us a few times. It usually has to be pretty significant push away of the ball for them to call it.My biggest gripe was where he got the time from after only finding four minutes in the first half (Ait-Nouri was down for three), I expected eight or nine, when I saw 'twelve' go up I thought Villa were making a sub! And then his final act of putting the whistle to his mouth to blow, then changing his mind and letting Villa have their last attack, quickly blowing up when they hit the post
Can't really judge the incidents too much after seeing them in the ground, he did give one of ours a booking for kicking/moving the ball away and failed to book a Villa player for doing the same thing, other than that and the added time, I didn't think he got that much wrong
Still not seen any replays on Neto ,not that many comments on hereWhat happened when Neto went down in the box? I was a long way from it so couldn’t really see, looked a possible penalty?
I was right near the possible Villa penalty with Doc’s little push! That could very easily have been given….
Sky didn’t show it in their highlights, MOTD2 did, I’d say no penalty, with the caveat, Salah in front of the Kop may get it.S
Still not seen any replays on Neto ,not that many comments on here
Fair enough but if you think Dawson wasn’t making the most of it as soon as the ref started to pay attention then you’re being a little naive. But opinions are what make a forum!!!You must have been watching a different match fella.
It was heart in the mouth time for me when that incident took placeAnother look at the Doc push on Watkins at the end has made me think we definitely got away with one. It was a clear penalty and the most blatant push - general consensus from what I can see/hear is that Watkins should have made more of it instead of trying to score.
Same. When it went to VAR I was convinced we were done. We got away with one.It was heart in the mouth time for me when that incident took place
I was expecting the referee to point to the spot tbh and was mighty relieved when he didn't.
Definetly.Not really. Not great, don’t get me wrong. But seen far, far worse.
I have no doubt in my mind that if Doc's push on Watkins had preceded Neto being brought down in the box, the Watkins PK would have been given, and then it's likely an entirely different match from there on out. The fact that Neto was not awarded a PK prior to Doc's push on Watkins probably worked in our favour (post second incident only), as allowing a PK to Villa for Watkins after denying the same to Neto would have sent Molineux into total meltdown (and rightly so).Another look at the Doc push on Watkins at the end has made me think we definitely got away with one. It was a clear penalty and the most blatant push - general consensus from what I can see/hear is that Watkins should have made more of it instead of trying to score.
I have no doubt in my mind that if Doc's push on Watkins had preceded Neto being brought down in the box, the Watkins PK would have been given, and then it's likely an entirely different match from there on out. The fact that Neto was not awarded a PK prior to Doc's push on Watkins probably worked in our favour (post second incident only), as allowing a PK to Villa for Watkins after denying the same to Neto would have sent Molineux into total meltdown (and rightly so).
The Neto non-call is precisely the kind of call Wolves should be getting IF indeed there was ever going to be an eventual evening up of the calls in the long run, as the law of averages would seem to call for. Home team, on the front foot, unstoppable player who's gotten past his mark all day long, had stayed on his feet in a similar attacking run to set up a goal already, and was threatening to do the same again when he was brought down. There was nothing in the mix to warrant giving the Villa defender(s) the benefit of the doubt, and you well know that if it was Watkins doing the same to (say) Toti or Ait-Nouri at Villa Park, it most assuredly would have been given.
I keep waiting for some signal that we are not viewed as the PL's (or even the FA's) unwanted red-headed stepchild.
This incident was one such perfect opportunity ... but not surprisingly, it wasn't given. Seems it never is, and never will be.