Bamford 'Leeds robbed'

[The Runner]

Loading…

www.bbc.co.uk

Not really sure what he's talking about. The assistant flagged him offside so even without VAR it was disallowed. Patrick, you were offside mate, just accept it.

 

[Leominster_Wolf]

Loading…

www.bbc.co.uk

Not really sure what he's talking about. The assistant flagged him offside so even without VAR it was disallowed. Patrick, you were offside mate, just accept it.

 

[Alex Rae The Substitute]

Bore off Paddy.

 

[JOSWolf]

Bitter Bamford has been referred to Saiss disallowed goal earlier in the season by a few on twitter. No doubt the Leeds biased media will be all over this travesty of justice disallowed goal for Bamford over the coming days when none gave a **** for numerous ones for us over the last 18 months.

 

[Leigh72]

Salty, love it

 

[Deleted member 4152]

Loading…

www.bbc.co.uk

Not really sure what he's talking about. The assistant flagged him offside so even without VAR it was disallowed. Patrick, you were offside mate, just accept it.

As you say. Not sure what his point is. Without var it would have been ruled out. So why is he having a pop at var.

Quality finish tho.

 

[Deleted member 11332]

Loading…

www.bbc.co.uk

Not really sure what he's talking about. The assistant flagged him offside so even without VAR it was disallowed. Patrick, you were offside mate, just accept it.

I was 'robbed' of over 200 quid aswell tbf. Never been happier to lose it. That caviar ***** can jog on enall.

 

[Rangiora Wolf]

Nothing like a bit of humility in the modern game. What a ****.

 

[Bossworld]

Bamford kept quiet the entire night with just his two shots. Has probably ruined many fantasy football teams too

 

[Tezthewolvesfan]

Who cares, we won...

 

[WS10Wolf]

Dreadful comments from Bamford and awful reporting by the BBC. “Leeds goal ruled out by VAR”. The goal was ruled out (correctly!) by the assistant’s flag. VAR merely agreed with him.

 

[Hoganstolemywife]

I'm all for having a go at VAR (even though it's been our best performer the last month), but this is just plain odd.

He was offside. It was given offside. VAR ratified it was offside.

Weird.

 

[Bossworld]

 

[Dubwolf71]

Have to admit I got a bit of a scare when the lines were drawn.

 

[Hoganstolemywife]

Have to admit I got a bit of a scare when the lines were drawn.

Me too. My heart sank as I thought it was onside, until I saw the Red line come out.

 

[Deleted member 5340]

Dear Patrick... Please direct your tears on to my big bag of orange chips... I've brought my own vinegar, thanks.

 

[VancouverWolf]

Loading…

www.bbc.co.uk

Not really sure what he's talking about. The assistant flagged him offside so even without VAR it was disallowed. Patrick, you were offside mate, just accept it.

He’s just venting at VAR. Others do it too.
people don’t always “just accept it”.

 

[Hoganstolemywife]

I just searched for Bamford VAR on google to see it again and I stumbled upon the one earlier in the season where he pointed and was given offside.

Now THAT was ludicrous.

 

[The Runner]

He’s just venting at VAR. Others do it too.
people don’t always “just accept it”.

But it's nothing to do with VAR. The assistant flagged him offside.

 

[VancouverWolf]

But it's nothing to do with VAR. The assistant flagged him offside.

I know but he’s just reacting like we all do sometimes......you never feel that we got the wrong end of the stick?
it’s nothing talk....is all.

 

[The Runner]

I know but he’s just reacting like we all do sometimes......you never feel that we got the wrong end of the stick?
it’s nothing talk....is all.

He's saying they were robbed because his goal was incorrectly ruled out for offside when it obviously wasn't. Can't see on any level how that equites to them being robbed.

 

[Oldskooldayz]

Starting to believe their own press now and the state of the replies on twitter is laughable.

I've worked with plenty of yorkies and if you let them go on enough they'll swear even the dogs*it smells sweeter around there

 

[VancouverWolf]

He's saying they were robbed because his goal was incorrectly ruled out for offside when it obviously wasn't. Can't see on any level how that equites to them being robbed.

I don’t care an iota what he says or thinks....who is he again?

 

[Brizzlewolf]

Dear Patrick, before VAR you would have been given offside, with VAR you were given offside....it's not difficult...

 

[Monketron]

LOTS to moan about with VAR, no one knows that more so than Wolves fans, but this was clearly not one of those moments, and as people have pointed out the on-field decision was offside so even without VAR it wouldn't have counted!

 

[reanswolf]

He is a good lad to be fair.

I thought he was offside, but then having seen the VAR lines thought he was played onside (just) by Coady's foot. Both players are leaning in opposite directions, but I would feel aggrieved had the situations been reversed. His arm and hand were offside but see rule below.

FA Offside rule: -

Offside position

It is not an offence to be in an offside position.

A player is in an offside position if:

• any part of the head, body or feet is in the opponents’ half (excluding the halfway line) and
• any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent
• The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered.

A player is not in an offside position if level with the:

• second-last opponent or
• last two opponents

BTW, we were better 1st half, they were better 2nd half, so a draw would have been fair. As usual, we lost it in midfield 2nd half but i expect this now.

 

[WV10Wolf]

Fans of the bestest promoted team in the world ever spending their Friday nights drawing lines on a still from the match whilst I ordered a curry, drank beer and watched us climb up the table. Marvellous.

 

[sedgwolf1980]

Ignore those stupid lines and watch the actually clip of the pass, he’s a good 2 yards off when the ball was played.

Of course, when the ball gets played never gets mentioned since the introduction of VAR, as it’s such a minor detail...

 

[Macman]

I like Bamford, but tough **** about last night. You win some, you lose some. and last night you lost. So **** off and get over it.

 

[VancouverWolf]

Or.....now get this....it’s quite radical I know, but , maybe....juuuust maybe, we don’t care what somebody said.

 

[North Bank]

If VAR was there or not the lineman’s flagged him offside so it wouldn’t have counted. Decent finish though, give him that.

 

[AndyWolves]

The silly sausage doesn't realise that VAR gave him a chance that he actually wasn't offside. Pre VAR he could have been onside but nothing would have been done, had he actually been onside the goal would have stood.

 

[donwolf]

He riminds me of Kevin Doyle the way he plays

 

[arctic rime]

Dreadful comments from Bamford and awful reporting by the BBC. “Leeds goal ruled out by VAR”. The goal was ruled out (correctly!) by the assistant’s flag. VAR merely agreed with him.

Biased commentary all night , maybe they tried paying us off again or send the spy’s out ?

 

[reanswolf]

We had 15 shots, they had 18, we had 5 on target they had 7, we had 41% possession, they had 59%.

So I think a draw is the least they deserved to be fair.

The offisde is controversial too, in my opinion.

But a great 3 points.

 

[Ewok vs Wolf]

Funny the media are so disappointed Leeds lost

 

[Pagey]

Hope you feel better this morning after the horrendous performance by the officials/var.

I feel ****ing fantastic. I've even forgiven them for awarding yous a free kick for elbowing Semedo.

I shouted offside at the TV at the time, the linesman gave it, Var confirmed it, Wtf are you moaning for?

 

[WS10Wolf]

We had 15 shots, they had 18, we had 5 on target they had 7, we had 41% possession, they had 59%.

So I think a draw is the least they deserved to be fair.

The offisde is controversial too, in my opinion.

But a great 3 points.

Controversial how? The linesman gave it offside and VAR showed he was correct. We’ve been unlucky not to come away with more in plenty of games this season, it happens.

 

[reanswolf]

Controversial how? The linesman gave it offside and VAR showed he was correct. We’ve been unlucky not to come away with more in plenty of games this season, it happens.

Sorry I just don't get how it was offside? Coady's foot was playing him onside IMO.

 

[WS10Wolf]

Sorry I just don't get how it was offside? Coady's foot was playing him onside IMO.

The review last night shows that Bamford’s knee was ahead of Coady’s heel, just.

I don’t like VAR any more than you do, think it’s hideous, but they’ve been giving those offside for the last two years. It’s either an unbelievable call from the assistant, or a lucky one. But going back to my other point, we’ve had plenty of games this season go against us by the slimmest margin, let’s not get on our high horse when one goes for us.