Contrarian
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2018
- Messages
- 15,000
- Reaction score
- 23,032
No it's
06' - Podence
Who is this 6 foot tall Podence?
No it's
06' - Podence
That's why I wanted Benteke. I wouldn't play it every game. But 15mins to go against a team sitting back. Raul and Benteke upfront, Adama and Neto outwide.
Last year if Neto had played that cross, Hwang would have headed it across the box to nobody.Between the lines. Between the lines. Between the lines.
Your beginning to sound like Bruno.
We didn't score yesterday by breaking the lines.
We scored with a diagonal to neto, who put an early cross in. Hwang some got a head on it. Podence nearly put it over.
All the between the lines **** created **** all.
We tried that under Mick. We got hammered rather too regularly. No thanks.No other team have got traditional wingers like ours. And the fact is we ain't going to get anywhere just aping a team. Embrace the differences.
And really playing 4-2-3-1 with podence as one of the 3 is not much different to playing 4-4-2 with Raul as one of the front 2. Raul gives a lot more to our midfield than Podence.
Or perhaps I should rephrase it so it sounds more au fait with the football snobs. We can play 4-2-3-1 with Raul playing as a number 10. Maybe play 4 6 0 with Hwang as a false 9 and Raul as a 10.
No surprises at Podence's lack of efficiency! I know he scored yesterday (a bit of a scuffed attempt but they all count), but I do wonder if Lage would prefer MGW centrally with Neto and Guedes on the right/left. I also think defensively MGW can put himself about a bit more than Podence, if he needs to drop in and support the two midfielders if we're in a 4-2-3-1 and not a 4-3-3.For anyone interested here's some stats on Guedes and some of our players based on last season
View attachment 29286
We also got hammered playing 4-3-3 regularly with Mick.We tried that under Mick. We got hammered rather too regularly. No thanks.
Agree with this we're desperate for a center mid and a striker, lot of money for another utility forward imoNot sure i understand this move that much tbh. He is a good player but not really what we are looking for at all and has a Mendes bailing us out feel to it to me.
If it is him for Neto then that would be horrible business yet again.
I dunno. There was a few times Raul had the opportunity to do the same thing and didn't get the right connection. Then again neither did Hwang or podence but they all count!Last year if Neto had played that cross, Hwang would have headed it across the box to nobody.
I’m just saying that last year we rarely had even one man in the box, now we have 3-4 on every counter, just feel we need to be more clinical. Having another striker/Jimenez as well as Guedes should help to address that issue greatly, hopefully for the Fulham game.I dunno. There was a few times Raul had the opportunity to do the same thing and didn't get the right connection. Then again neither did Hwang or podence but they all count!
You're clueless, Klopp changed his style because he noticed the way the game is going.Between the lines. Between the lines. Between the lines.
Your beginning to sound like Bruno.
We didn't score yesterday by breaking the lines.
We scored with a diagonal to neto, who put an early cross in. Hwang some got a head on it. Podence nearly put it over.
All the between the lines **** created **** all.
I’d love us to play 44 ****ing 2.Yeah, definitely good to do what no other good team in the league do and play 4 4 2 with traditional wingers
*Sean Dyche thoughts*I’d love us to play 44 ****ing 2.
Two rapid wingers causing havoc, two prolific strikers up top, and a solid defence
Nope. Just not over complicating it like some of you “kids” do!! Dan I mean you here!!*Sean Dyche thoughts*
Can you give me a good coach in modern game who does this.Nope. Just not over complicating it like some of you “kids” do!! Dan I mean you here!!
I wouldn’t claim to be close enough to any coach’s style to say. I’m no tactics expert, not football expert.Can you give me a good coach in modern game who does this.
Where's the Belotti rumour from or is it just pure wishing?
Yeah, it was more simple now. Now it is far more complicated as the game as evolvedI wouldn’t claim to be close enough to any coach’s style to say. I’m no tactics expert, not football expert.
However, I do maintain football is a simple game, over complicated by people who should know better.
I believe that is paraphrased from a certain Bill Shankly
Would love it, but (and I know it's only a rumour and any numbers can be inaccurate), €70k net a week seems beyond where we'd go
There isn't one.Wheres this Neto to arsenal rmour come from?
Would be a disaster to lose him
Possibly not, it’s about £110k a week gross.Would love it, but (and I know it's only a rumour and any numbers can be inaccurate), €70k net a week seems beyond where we'd go
Think it seems like Guedes is the player we wanted Trincao to be.Excited to watch the lad play.. Trincao came with a lot of doubters, but most of what I’ve read about Guedes from Valencia fans, is that we’ve got a baller.
Excited to watch the lad play.. Trincao came with a lot of doubters, but most of what I’ve read about Guedes from Valencia fans, is that we’ve got a baller.
Where is the money coming from to pay for him?Percy confirmed... Nice!
Where is the money coming from to pay for him?
Any better than what we have?