Perton Wolf
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2010
- Messages
- 17,231
- Reaction score
- 13,585
I can't believe so many of you are moaning about that, unreal. You'd want it given up the other end.
What????, gave us nothing apart from the penaltyBefore this nonsense I was saying the ref was doing a pretty good job. Awful decision. Keeper was never going to save it in a million years.
Indeed, can't really see the argument. If the GK's vision is obscured then it doesn't matter about hypotheticals, it's offside.
Whether he's getting near it or not is totally irrelevant.I get why it has been disallowed, but he isn't getting anywhere near it and it is not a clear and obvious error. The game is ruined
Regardless of the decision, we didn’t deserve anything after that second half performance. Really really bad and out of nowhere given how good we were in the first 45.
Ah well, season over now.
Hes not offside if hes not interfering with playThat's not the rule though, is it? The laws don't say the ref can ignore it if he wasn't getting there anyway.
Not sure what some of you lot are complaining about, to be honest.
I thought VAR could only intervene for clear and obvious errors...Whether he's getting near it or not is totally irrelevant.
It's all down to lack of squad depth now isn't it! The fit players are having to play too much and the kids aren't good enough to play more than a few minutesRegardless of the decision, we didn’t deserve anything after that second half performance. Really really bad and out of nowhere given how good we were in the first 45.
Ah well, season over now.
Understood, but why send him to the monitor? All that does is give us hope and hangs the red out to dry.That's not the rule though, is it? The laws don't say the ref can ignore it if he wasn't getting there anyway.
Not sure what some of you lot are complaining about, to be honest.
We would’ve only salvaged a point…That’s 10 points VAR has now cost us
Insane really
I think a draw would have been fair tbh. Total dominance from us first half, and that flipped second half. Their goals were fortuitous and they didn’t have a glut of goal scoring opportunities.Regardless of the decision, we didn’t deserve anything after that second half performance. Really really bad and out of nowhere given how good we were in the first 45.
Ah well, season over now.
I promise you I wouldn’t, he’s not interfering with play, he just isn’t.I can't believe so many of you are moaning about that, unreal. You'd want it given up the other end.
well if your referring to west ham getting relegated with 42 points then yes its possible but with our current bottom 3 it wont happenI hate to say this but relegation is still a possibility chaps!
How have you posted then lolJust smashed my phone to bits in temper
It's down to interpretation whether the ref thinks the GK has had his vision impeded, unlike when they draw the lines for an offside.Understood, but why send him to the monitor? All that does is give us hope and hangs the red out to dry.
so VAR isn't for clear and obvious errors anymore?It's down to interpretation whether the ref thinks the GK has had his vision impeded, unlike when they draw the lines for an offside.
I get that but whether you think he is interfering with play is a subjective call. The on field ref gave the goal, VAR shouldn’t be re-reffing. Had the on-field ref originally disallowed it, I’d have had no complaints.That's not the rule though, is it? The laws don't say the ref can ignore it if he wasn't getting there anyway.
Not sure what some of you lot are complaining about, to be honest.
Exactly my thoughts and I thought I understood VAR, if it's subjective, a decision has already been made. No flag. They re-reffed it. Which is all you ever hear them saying is not what VAR is for. So which is it? Just a total mess.I get that but whether you think he is interfering with play is a subjective call. The on field ref gave the goal, VAR shouldn’t be re-reffing. Had the on-field ref originally disallowed it, I’d have had no complaints.
I would want that!offside given if we were leading 2-1, not sure when subjective decisions became something for VAR to get involved in though. Fabianski can see it imo, he tried to guess which way max would head the ball, guessed wrong and was bailed out by VAR intervention. I just give up trying to interpret the current laws of the game.I promise you I wouldn’t, he’s not interfering with play, he just isn’t.
The energy was there, the application wasn’t and neither was any ounce of football intelligence in our back line. To me, to you, no to me, no to you Oops, GOAL. ****s!!!!A rope a dope game I'm afraid, we had very little energy 2nd half.
Just about every corner ever is offside if standing by the goalie counts!I can't believe so many of you are moaning about that, unreal. You'd want it given up the other end.
By that logic West Ham didn't deserve anything from their first half? a draw would have been more than fair given the whole game.
No I wouldn'tI can't believe so many of you are moaning about that, unreal. You'd want it given up the other end.
Can't be offside from a corner, it's second phase. A lot of teams have players on the line so not always an issue.Just about every corner ever is offside if standing by the goalie counts!
That’s 10 points VAR has now cost us
Insane really
That was not a clear and obvious error which VAR is supposed to be used forVAR didn’t cost us anything today.
He was offside and directly infront of the keeper and his eye line.
Harsh as he wasn’t getting there, but it wasn’t the wrong decision in the eyes of the law…..
If that had been the other way, I bet you would have wanted that disallowed?
Also how soft was the “foul” that disallowed their header?
On this one, sorry, VAR while harsh wasn’t wrong
Wasn’t remotely softAlso how soft was the “foul” that disallowed their header?