Wolves v Fulham comms thread.

[Jack Russell]

Fulham have been in fine form of late so I think we are in for a hard match. Much depends on our team selection making it a difficult match to predict. I hope we will have enough to give them a good game.

Wishing Pedro Neto a very happy birthday!

So COYW sock it to them and grab the three points. We don't want them to get above us!

 

[Jack Russell]

I'm happy with that starting eleven.

 

[Glow69]

Looks like that twitter user got it bang on

 

[Wednesbury Wolf]

Doyle unlucky to not start.

 

[Tring Wolf]

Quite like the look of that side. Interesting to see how we look playing a back four.

 

[Aurum Lupus]

Are we playing 4 at the back? BBC have Bellegarde as CB

 

[WickedWolfie]

I'm happy with that starting eleven.

I'm not. We have been bloody woeful every time we've tried four at the back.

Edited to add:
I really hope to be proved wrong but fear the worst.

 

[Perton Wolf]

Support that lineup, think it would've been tough if we'd persisted with 5 at the back and Bellegarde CF.

At least we should give it more of a go.

 

[GoldenHorseshoe]

4 at the back?

 

[Matt]

Genuinely no idea how that team will get on. Interesting one.

 

[wolvesjoe]

Attack, attack, attack.....

 

[Perton Wolf]

I'm not. We have been bloody woeful every time we've tried four at the back.

We'd have lost anyway playing our usual back 5 and Bellegarde CF.

At least GON is mixing it up a bit. Toti hasn't been great for me recently anyway, so right decision to bring Bueno in for the 4.

 

[StaffordWolf]

Great line up to play to Fraser's strengths, time to shine lad.

 

[WolfInSheep'sClothing]

4-2-3-1! Could be the way to go from now until the end of the season.

 

[GoldenHorseshoe]

I'm not. We have been bloody woeful every time we've tried four at the back.

4 at the back against WHU, left huge space

 

[CelebrityWolf]

I'm not. We have been bloody woeful every time we've tried four at the back.

We really really haven't

 

[Tring Wolf]

Fulham unchanged. Adama, Willian and Palhinha all on the bench.

 

[Jack Russell]

Good luck to Fraser and to Pedro on his birthday.

 

[DJLWolf]

What's up with Dawson?

 

[92WWFC]

Happy for Nathan Fraser.

So glad we aren't playing Neto or Bellegarde as some sort or 'false 9'. I hate it, it makes the team so disjointed. A natural 9 (or a Hwang/Cunha type who can play centrally fairly comfortably) has to be better even if it's a kid and Fraser hasn't looked out of place so far.

Back 4 is gutsy but I don't see us as somehow not being able to play this way. Just needs some work on the training ground which could have started a while ago.

 

[Jamwolf]

Dawson ?

 

[Mile End Wanderer]

Fraser to bag come on

 

[WickedWolfie]

What's up with Dawson?

Got a knock reportedly

 

[Wednesbury Wolf]

I'm glad Fraser is starting but that forward line doesn't have many goals in it.

 

[Mancwolf56]

Dawson ?

Injured

 

[Mile End Wanderer]

I'm glad Fraser is starting but that forward line doesn't have many goals in it.

Never say never

Let’s back the lads and make some noise come on you Wolves!!

 

[Ned]

I’m alright with this, you know. It might not work but I’m all for trying something different when you’ve got different players available. At least Fraser is going to have players in and around him so won’t be isolated or be asked to play a false 9.

I’ll probably be slating the changes come full time but at the moment I’m very intrigued.

 

[Kingswood Wolf]

Good Lord (sick emoji)

 

[Black Country Wanderer]

I think it will end up a back 3 anyway RAN will not have the discipline to stay as a natural LB

 

[WickedWolfie]

Support that lineup, think it would've been tough if we'd persisted with 5 at the back and Bellegarde CF.

At least we should give it more of a go.

I fear the choice is like being asked if you would rather have syphillis or gonorhea.

 

[WickedWolfie]

I’m alright with this, you know. It might not work but I’m all for trying something different when you’ve got different players available. At least Fraser is going to have players in and around him so won’t be isolated or be asked to play a false 9.

I’ll probably be slating the changes come full time but at the moment I’m very intrigued.

Fair comment. I'd love to have egg on my face come the final whistle.

 

[Jeru360]

Like the look of this. Maybe we will see the Bellegarde we originally signed now that he’s not playing as a striker.

 

[Glow69]

Not as big as of a change compared to when we went from 5 to 4 with Nunos lot.

 

[Barnet Wolves]

Good luck to Santi.

If the back 4 doesn't work let's all please refrain from singling Santi out. It's an experimental line up.

 

[A3wolf]

I’m alright with this, you know. It might not work but I’m all for trying something different when you’ve got different players available. At least Fraser is going to have players in and around him so won’t be isolated or be asked to play a false 9.

I’ll probably be slating the changes come full time but at the moment I’m very intrigued.

Agree, good to try it out - if it works great (and confuses Coventry in their prep), if not we bring Toti on.

 

[lobodelsur]

Fulham unchanged. Adama, Willian and Palhinha all on the bench.

A LOT of experience on the Fulham bench - conceivably stronger than some of the starting Xl.

 

[AndyY]

I assume that Lemina will drop in to the centre of the back 4 when necessary?

 

[Wolf316]

Like it.

 

[Monketron]

4 at the back scares me. I know this is ultimately what GON wants to play but every time we've tried it with the current players it's looked open as hell.

 

[Streathamwolf]

RAN as a full back makes me a little nervous. Given 4 at the back Hugo B may have been a better option.