That was my first thought when I saw the thread title. I could see him getting a 4 match ban regardless of the lack of evidence.I bet Podence is worried.
Yet Ratface got away Scot free.
“With respect to Wolves’ series of disciplinary breaches, as they have no functioning striker of their own, it has been determined that the fairest solution is to suspend a striker from the team playing the highest number of their relegation rivals before the end of the season.Fulham play all of our rivals in that period.
I don’t think there’s a more unlikeable player in world football.It’s disgusting that petulant child got away with nothing.
The VAR Review: Bruno Fernandes penalty incidents, Podence spitting, Man City offside?
A look at the big VAR rulings in the Premier League, including penalty incidents involving Man Utd's Bruno Fernandes and Newcastle's Fabian Schar.www.espn.com
Podence cleared already according to this:
"If the spitting offence had been proven, Podence was facing a six-match suspension. There will be no retrospective action, as there is no evidence and it has already been assessed."
It’s the lack of consistency that’s annoying.Mitrovic can have no complaints. He deserved to be banned until the end of the season, and this ban near enough covers that period.
He can when Ratty got away with it.Mitrovic can have no complaints. He deserved to be banned until the end of the season, and this ban near enough covers that period.
Yeah, they're always handing out bans and fines without a shred of evidence aren't they?That was my first thought when I saw the thread title. I could see him getting a 4 match ban regardless of the lack of evidence.
Probably at the time Brentford have /can’t qualify for Europe with the majority of the ban happening in the closed season.When will Toney get banned? seems to have been lingering on for a few months now.
How long do you think he should be banned for?The FA are quite rightly set to appeal, saying the ban should be longer.
For the sake of every referee at grassroots level, I hope the FA are successful.
I take it the FA will be going back and banning Ratface?The FA are quite rightly set to appeal, saying the ban should be longer.
For the sake of every referee at grassroots level, I hope the FA are successful.
It’s a joke they’re doing that having let Fernandes get away with nothing.The FA are quite rightly set to appeal, saying the ban should be longer.
For the sake of every referee at grassroots level, I hope the FA are successful.
Regarding the comparisons to this and the Bruno incident...
I'm far from a fan of his and he does seem to present as being quite a toxic influence, despite all his technical abilities as a player and certainly not somebody you'd want on your side when the chips are down.
However, Mitrovic aggressively shoved a referee whereas Bruno was moreso him brushing off the linesman after the linesman had already put his hands on him (albeit with good intent). I can understand why the Bruno incident wasn't punished as it wasn't him that initiated the physical contact.
Ah but the rule of the third person was only for our game and the next day to avoid any thought of bias against us. It wasn't meant to stay as proved since.Looking at the behaviour of the Fulham players after the red card - and remebering Lemina's red - how did any stay on the pitch? Some of United's were charging in as well. The lack of consistency is appalling!
How long do you think he should be banned for?
That’s the argument that ManU fans have been using ad nauseam. I don’t buy it.
For a start, he received no punishment for the incident, no red, no yellow, not even a verbal warning. Secondly, the assistant intervened because Bruno had already shoved TAA who was holding onto the ball. So the assistant was already responding to an aggressive act by Bruno, and his reaction to the Assistant, was to shove him and give him a disdainful look, like he can do what he likes. That’s not the first time Bruno thinks he’s above the law, and the officials are letting him get away with it week in, week out.
Yes I agree Mitro’s incident was worse, but not black and white, as the comparison in punishments would suggest. Bruno should at least have received a yellow, perhaps more. I mean Lemina got a second yellow for just running towards the ref. There is zero consistency when it comes to certain teams and players.
Or not...The VAR Review: Bruno Fernandes penalty incidents, Podence spitting, Man City offside?
A look at the big VAR rulings in the Premier League, including penalty incidents involving Man Utd's Bruno Fernandes and Newcastle's Fabian Schar.www.espn.com
Podence cleared already according to this:
"If the spitting offence had been proven, Podence was facing a six-match suspension. There will be no retrospective action, as there is no evidence and it has already been assessed."
Nobody is doubting Mitrovic was worse but that Fernandes got absolutely zero punishment so what message does that send out?Fernandes should have been sent off and it was wrong that he got away with it. But Mitrovic not only shoved the referee, but he carried it on by going face to face with the referee, forcing the referee to step backwards.
In my opinion, Mitrovic behaviour was a lot more threatening than Fernandes. That is the big difference.
Nobody is doubting Mitrovic was worse but that Fernandes got absolutely zero punishment so what message does that send out?
Devils advocate’s question: Why is the Linesman allowed to grab Fernandes’ arm, when it is forbidden for Fernandes to touch the Linesman?I agree. Fernandes should have been sent off, The FA let down all grassroots referees by not charging Fernandes.
The answer my friend is blowing in the wind.Yeah, they're always handing out bans and fines without a shred of evidence aren't they?
For the avoidance of doubt, I'm being sarcastic. If there's no evidence, there's no punishment, in football and life in general.
Devils advocate’s question: Why is the Linesman allowed to grab Fernandes’ arm, when it is forbidden for Fernandes to touch the Linesman?
The question isn’t difficult. Why is he allowed to touch a player when a player is not allowed to touch the linesman?Watch the whole incident, not just the edited clip shared by countless Man U fans. Bruno shoved TAA first, as TAA was holding the ball. The Assistant intervened to stop handbags, that’s his job. Bruno didn’t like it, shoved the Assistant and looked down on him like he was more important. He was completely out of order. It wasn’t as aggressive Mitro was, but it was worthy of a card of some form.