yateleywolf
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2006
- Messages
- 3,770
- Reaction score
- 1,437
Cheers never knew thatPayed half as he was on half the salary at Spurs he was here and we topped him up as part of his severance deal
Cheers never knew thatPayed half as he was on half the salary at Spurs he was here and we topped him up as part of his severance deal
Does that mean we now take over what would have been the final year of his contract though?Payed half as he was on half the salary at Spurs he was here and we topped him up as part of his severance deal
62 mil a yr on amortisation costs, lmaoWell £62m went on amortisation costs so that's that covered
When you look at the numbers associated with running a football club it's frightening and even an income of some £200m could get swallowed up pretty easily without spaffing millions on players
Was told by a cast iron source on it.Cheers never knew that
No idea what is happening with it now, just that was state of play last seasonDoes that mean we now take over what would have been the final year of his contract though?
Doris the tea lady.Interest payments
Was Nuno and staff, should have corrected myself. He took less staff to Spurs but essentially we topped up half the pay. I am not sure if that is because we paid the extra year as well.As if Spurs were paying Nuno 50% of the salary he was on here?!
What is the other 29% spent on ? Approx 58 million.
Not sure you understand why you are laughing your **** off. Transfer fees paid out are amortized over the contract. The same financials show over 60 million of income on player sales.62 mil a yr on amortisation costs, lmao
I know that mate im laughing at the sorry state of our finances. 140 mil on wages 60 mil amortisation costs means we havnt got a pot to **** in. And folk think were gonna spunk 45 mil on nunes, we cant afford almeida or palhinha. No body wants neves. In jan traore and dendonker can sign pre contract deals with other teams. You gotta laugh.Not sure you understand why you are laughing your **** off. Transfer fees paid out are amortized over the contract. The same financials show over 60 million of income on player sales.
the Revenue from all sources and the expenditure on everything down to stadium maintenance and Doris is shown in a document called the financial statements . It’s not secret. Asking where the money went either means the questioner doesnt read the financials or don’t understand them. Perhaps it would help some if there was a thread on the financials…
But if you're looking at 'where the turnover goes' you'd really be focused on net player trading. 2m last year."Amortisation of player's registrations", £62.14mView attachment 28685
I think you'll find we have the option of a further twelve months on Donk's contract after June 2023.I know that mate im laughing at the sorry state of our finances. 140 mil on wages 60 mil amortisation costs means we havnt got a pot to **** in. And folk think were gonna spunk 45 mil on nunes, we cant afford almeida or palhinha. No body wants neves. In jan traore and dendonker can sign pre contract deals with other teams. You gotta laugh.
I don't know but given the precedent for other players would be surprised if we didn't have such an option.I think you'll find we have the option of a further twelve months on Donk's contract after June 2023.
I wasn't. I was responding to someone asking what happened to the "£58m" that wasn't spent on wages wentBut if you're looking at 'where the turnover goes' you'd really be focused on net player trading. 2m last year.
I think fosun will ideally want net player trading to be a small negative only. Over a 3 ish year period. We're not making many sales this summer!
Whilst enough are willing to pay it or more nothing will change, the best player’s usually have more than one club competing To sign them and so it goes on, then the agents want their not insignificant slice of the dealThat may be true but what can we do about it?