And there’s the predictable comment I said would happen. Just because you’re criticising women doesn’t make it sexist.
The majority of the awful male pundits have strong histories in the game and have experience to draw on to make their conclusions, even if they do it poorly. You’re absolutely...
Whats the issue with pointing out the obvious. They’re quite blatantly only there due to quotas. With the exception of Emma Hayes, most of the female pundits are awful, and whilst that’s not because they’re female (or limited to the women), it’s insulting to the intelligence to see people being...
You’d think it would have come up on the agenda. This is a guy who had to be talked down from a 60,000 megabowl. Pretty sure he won’t be happy seeing some bodge job of extending out the Steve Bull lower tier with seats that won’t be covered to compliment temporary stands.
It’s a high profile role in the public realm, the top of his field. If he’s happy with an image of not turning up at an important part of the process then that’s alright if he feels it’s not important in succeeding. Wish him well.
Kind of depends. It’s a pretty high profile job compared to sitting anonymously in an office. The employment laws might be the same, but the reality is you should make sacrifices to be at the top of your field.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.