Search results

I disagree with your opinion on Nike/ Adidas doing nothing. They have huge networks and will spend money on advertising. That's not what I think that's an actual fact. It also leads into the bigger sponsorships and will lead into awareness in other territories as people are aware of the swoosh...

No idea on the financial model the club/ Castore have got, could be anything. If a brand discounts something so quickly it's usually because it's costs are covered with initial sales but I could be hugely wide of the mark there with Wolves. Castore will have their own trusted manufacturers...

Not quite, Castore will design and build the manufacturing standards as well as define the materials and colour swatches. The kits/ clothing bearing the Castore label will then be made under license by a manufacturer designated by Wolves/ Fosun. Bar the matchday kit which is made in Castore...

Of course it does, they have a sales and marketing network a tinpot company like Vinny's doesn't have. Having worked with brands in the past the return on investment for marketing pounds cannot be understated, there's a reason they all do it and it isn't because anybody won a trophy. It's key...

Credibility in terms of quality of product and commercial success. It's how we sell ourselves to the world and if you look like you're doing it on the cheap then attracting bigger sponsors and outside investment becomes harder because you're not selling a long term vision. The quality of the...

It's not all about revenue. There is brand awareness and the credibility that goes with it.

Not really, an established brand will have infinitely more exposure and reach than a no mark brand. You then have the marketing costs associated with that along with the distribution network. Profit margin on the products will easily be outweighed if the volume of sales decreases as you...

It's not a sister company, it's nothing to do with Wolves at all. It is to do with Fosun/ Guo though. Could be one of two things, a shell company to put money into the club via shirt/ clothing sales or a way to get money out of the club via merchandise they don't have to reinvest into the...

But not to the same standard or design. There's a reason those brands are successful and have endured longevity.

You do realise that increased exposure and quality products will increase revenues? Having a tinpot brand with zero credibility at the outset will reduce both sales and exposure? That's simple business economics.

It depends what we do. Hoever's best position is RWB in the same way Glasner uses Mitchell and Munoz. Hoever's weakness is concentration but he's good going forward. Doherty is an abysmal full back he can only play in the RWB role and only as a back up. Santi Bueno isn't anywhere near quick...

You put him as a first team starter for us and he isn't good enough to be that. Having seen him play he's not better than Hoever.

Exactly this, he's rubbish

I really hope not, I think Hobbs has shown in Gomes that we can buy good players for lower value without blowing the wage budget.

It doesn't have to.

Our average wage is 4th bottom in the PL.

The percentage of players sold for profit compared to actually play is very small yet everybody thinks it's a sustainable model. It isn't, it's lottery ticket stuff. And to equate purchases to transfer fees is silly, PL revenue is not dictated by this it's dictated by TV money.

The players you've mentioned bar Welbeck (who is unlikely to come to Wolves given he likes Brighton and wants to stay) are all pretty crap and do not benefit the squad at all, they make it a relegation squad. I can understand the club wanting to live within their means but this nonsense of...

We've the 4th lowest wage bill as it is. Wages are a direct correlation to league position finish. Bottom 3 wages will get us relegated.

Dawson/ Bueno/ Kilman about as quick as a photo.