It’s a tiny but I think important point. VAR isn’t in place to re-referee. Neither is it there to judge yellow cards.
Therefore, on what grounds did VAR have to intervene? Similar to Kilman’s previously disallowed goal.
I can see why an opinion of both occasions could go against us. However...
Love Nuno like he’s my dad (sorry dad) but the way he plays football is only great, with the right players. Otherwise, it will always end up being square pegs/round holes and becomes a turgid, immobile, defend for 88 minutes, mess.
At the end of the day, if 15 of the 20 Premier League clubs voted to get rid of VAR, it would be gone. The fact that it’s never on the Premier League meetings agenda should tell you all you need to know about the other Clubs’ attitude to VAR.
You’re convoluting your first sentence with an acceptance of VAR. I would say that’s not correct. The Coventry player was offside and it was the right decision.
But by god, I’ve never agreed more with anyone on here as I do with your second sentence.
No-one ever wanted VAR introduced to rule...
I’m the other way…ish. The decision was correct because of VAR. I still want it binned. Hate it.
In football, I prefer human error to technological fact.
Im not so sure about that. He was coming back from an offside position and was positioning himself level. Just not level enough. It’s harsh but thems the rules.
Sa is pain in the ****. With the ball at his feet, he’s a car crash, but then two minutes later he’s pulling off a worldie from point blank range…but then, gets beaten at his near post when it’d be less difficult to save it. I can’t get my head around it. Is he good, is he ****? Can’t quite...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.