Yeah, but the problem is (lets use Forest) the clubs who are operating better than them on the pitch have little ways of actually growing the company revenue, so they're eternally there to be picked off and never actually grow, it's a monopoly.
Villa will do.
Spurs, no way, they're one of the most profitable clubs and earn loads from the stadium. Chelsea are just good at getting away with it, plus, they're somehow able to offload players with ease.
Yes/No, you didn't have such blocks in place before to stop clubs progressing that you have now.
United finish 17th and still have more purchasing power than the majority of the league, that's just wrong.
Or he has a successful year and we can offer him another straight after?
A contract is a sign of faith. Faith that we as a club believe he has what it takes.
You're throwing a hissy fit over a player that never joined, gone to play in the farmers land and has had one solid season under a manager renowned for his systems that bring the best out of players but are very tied in.
Nothing to get in a twist about, buddy, Im not the one fretting in July.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.