Kashmire Hawker
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- May 18, 2017
- Messages
- 6,151
- Reaction score
- 10,652
With it bouncing of Fabiniho's knee, what's the justification for disallowing that?!
Quite longHow ****ing long was that!
LiVARpoolCan anyone explain that please? He looked offside initially but the actual goal he was clearly not offside what is this rule with two defenders?
Precisely... they have ruled it out because it wasn't a deliberate touch but as you said, he slid in to get it. Pure nonsense decision.Would have been instantly disallowed in the Premier League. And Liverpool would be given a penalty.
Not sure why it's disallowed, clearly comes off a Liverpool defender. Not a deflection, either, he comes sliding in to clear the ball. Unless Benzema was offside on the initial cross (I don't think he was), not sure why that was disallowed.
It's the rule I thought.Can anyone explain that please? He looked offside initially but the actual goal he was clearly not offside what is this rule with two defenders?
It’s LiverpoolWith it bouncing of Fabiniho's knee, what's the justification for disallowing that?!
With it bouncing of Fabiniho's knee, what's the justification for disallowing that?!
Peter Walton thinks that the officials got it right.... (whatever they decided).....The ball was played by a Liverpool player got to be onside. Needs to be cleared up this. Let's see if BT try to sort it out...
What the **** does intentional have to do with it hahahaNot an intentional touch? Let's see if Zidane runs on the pitch and unintentionally drops the nut on klopp.
“Let’s bring in Peter Walton”Peter Walton thinks that the officials got it right.... (whatever they decided).....
Not a deliberate play allegedly. Learning new rules often since VAR came in
When you find out please let me know as I want to know this also.What the **** does intentional have to do with it hahaha
Can rule out every own goal in history then?What the **** does intentional have to do with it hahaha
Watching football for over 45 years it's getting more and more complicated..Not a deliberate play allegedly. Learning new rules often since VAR came in
How the hell can they call it a deflection when he’s made a deliberate play to get the ball?How can a VAR official decide whether a defender has deliberately played the ball or not? Are they mind readers?
Fabinho slides in to get the ball and knees it into Benzema’s path. For me that’s a goal.
They can’t which is why the rule is total *******s. But it is still the rule.How can a VAR official decide whether a defender has deliberately played the ball or not? Are they mind readers?
Fabinho slides in to get the ball and knees it into Benzema’s path. For me that’s a goal.
Well... I'll give it a stab. Not that I agree with what I'm about to say.Anyone any the wiser?
That's a goal, surely?
Offside or not. Fabinho's action renders it irrelevant.