northnorfolkwolf
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2006
- Messages
- 28,288
- Reaction score
- 17,467
I know we've done VAR to death on here but watching the cricket has made me realise how good and open their review system is. I know it's a different game and all the rest but the principles are the same - basically to review a potentially wrong decision by the ref/umpire. The reviewer is in the ground, the mic is on straight away and the views/opinions of the adjudicator are heard at the time by everyone in the ground. It's fast, it's clear and there can be no accusations of it being underhand/dishonest. Why does VAR have to be at Stockley Park? It's far more sensible and far less open to abuse if the reviewer is in the ground and that his comments are not secret, as at present, but made live for all to hear. What is so difficult for the authorities to have this in place for next season?