Cornwall Wolf
Has a lot to say
- Joined
- May 25, 2017
- Messages
- 1,444
- Reaction score
- 5,252
NoòooooooooooooooooCornwall Wolf liked this post! Does that mean …………
NoòooooooooooooooooCornwall Wolf liked this post! Does that mean …………
Well we are keeping Neves, as I keep reminding the mix.
It’s not a bad shout to sell RAN but don’t think he will go for that much this summer. His value will only go up barring an injury ravaged season or something equally unfortunate. Sell him next year. Don’t quite remember what the sell on clause we will owe Angers is.
But also if that’s where the club needs to get the coin from to re-jig the midfield and add a quality CB and another attacker then I would not be unhappy if that is the case.
Sell Neves next summer and then the ball will have well and truly started rolling.
This literally will not happen and is *******s.
Pretty sure, as someone else said, that we have an option to buy out the 50% sell on fee for £10m, which can be exercised as we wish. So surely if we were to sell we would just pay the 10m and anything above 20m would be tje profitThis literally will not happen and is *******s.
We sell him for £45 million and we pay half of it to Angers. So our fee would need to be £90 million for us to receive this fee.
Not happening. Next.
Pretty sure, as someone else said, that we have an option to buy out the 50% sell on fee for £10m, which can be exercised as we wish. So surely if we were to sell we would just pay the 10m and anything above 20m would be tje profit
CorrectPretty sure, as someone else said, that we have an option to buy out the 50% sell on fee for £10m, which can be exercised as we wish. So surely if we were to sell we would just pay the 10m and anything above 20m would be tje profit
Last years Nunes. We were never signing him either..,Don’t know if I’ve missed this being posted yet but if not:
It may well be rubbish, but we can just buy out the clause for £10m so we only have to knock that off any potential sale fee, it was a good move last summer knowing what we eventually sell him for would be far higherThis literally will not happen and is *******s.
We sell him for £45 million and we pay half of it to Angers. So our fee would need to be £90 million for us to receive this fee.
Not happening. Next.
Not good enough for us though, apparently.Don’t know if I’ve missed this being posted yet but if not:
I thought the same.Cornwall Wolf liked this post! Does that mean …………
This literally will not happen and is *******s.
We sell him for £45 million and we pay half of it to Angers. So our fee would need to be £90 million for us to receive this fee.
Not happening. Next.
Ait nouri is really talented. We might regret thatExplains why Palhinha is no longer needed maybe?!
Keep Neves, sell Ait Nouri!
I don't think 35m is good enough to consider it yet. 45m would mske me think about it. Selling him.is not something i particularly want and wpuld like to keep our best players unless they really want to go.Ok so we buy a sell out clause for £10 million and he goes for £35 million?
I think we’d be mad to do it.
He could go for double that in a few years.
Just can’t see it.
And Keith Chegwin is dead. Mind you, you'd need to be on life support to follow flipping Fulham!Yes but have you seen who their fans are? Nigel Havers, Hugh Grant, Daniel Radcliffe, Keith Chegwin, Des Lynham, Richard Osman, Diddie David Hamilton among other luvvies.
No wonder they are nice to each other. We've got Noddy Holder and half of Led Zepplin.
Ok so we buy a sell out clause for £10 million and he goes for £35 million?
I think we’d be mad to do it.
He could go for double that in a few years.
Just can’t see it.
Keep Neves
Sign Nunes
Sell Coady
Ruben captain, new contract, move to 4 at the back…?
Two very interesting snippets from Romano:
- City after a new midfielder with their priority being Kalvin Phillips after giving Rodri and new deal.
- They are ready to let Zinchenko leave.
Happy to see Nunes not mentioned and I j kw we have been linked with Zinchenko for a few years now.
I’d put him in and sell pod personally.
Adama 6200, podence 3400.Adama has played approx. Three times as many minutes on the pitch. So Podence statistically looks the better player per minute.
This was the original discussion - even if you double the numbers, his stats don’t show that he has a much, much better end product than Traore.This ain't true chief, pod has a much, much better end product than traore
I'd sell Podence in a heartbeat. I rate him, but i cant stand his antics and he is pretty injury prone.
The apostrophe in that neon sign is really naffing me off
Yeah, me too. But if (and it’s a big “if”) it’s done correctly. In that reinvestments allow us to make incremental improvements. For example, not one or two in for the amount we recoup, but three or four of a lesser value that have the potential to treble what we pay for them whilst still taking us up a place or two in the league or challenging for a cup.I really like Ait Nouri but I'd sell him in a heartbeat for that price.
Cucurella is the perfect example of how to buy & sell. I'd like to see more of that from us
Yeah, me too. But if (and it’s a big “if”) it’s done correctly. In that reinvestments allow us to make incremental improvements. For example, not one or two in for the amount we recoup, but three or four of a lesser value that have the potential to treble what we pay for them whilst still taking us up a place or two in the league or challenging for a cup.
I can see next off this production line being Neto, and ‘maybe’ Kilman, with Toti and Chiquinhio as possibilities too.
Your earlier post in my opinion is a misrepresentation of the stats. It bothered me enough that I felt the need to check myself and disclose them on a broader scale.Adama 6200, podence 3400.
Your maths might be a tad out here mate, that’s less than double, not three times as many
This was the original discussion - even if you double the numbers, his stats don’t show that he has a much, much better end product than Traore.
21/22Adama 6200, podence 3400.
Your maths might be a tad out here mate, that’s less than double, not three times as many
This was the original discussion - even if you double the numbers, his stats don’t show that he has a much, much better end product than Traore.
Neither of them have good enough end product for a team that relies exclusively on its front three for goals.
I’m surprised he didn’t fall over.
Premier LeagueI’m not going to keep arguing as I always feel it gets incredibly dull and everyone’s position gets entrenched regardless - but pods cup record is good, and distorts his stats. Maybe we should only play him in cups!
In the premier league, pods record is not much, much better than traores. And neither pod nor traores end product is good enough for a team that relies on their front three for goals and assists.
I’m off to a football tournament I’d imagine without Wi-Fi, so have a great morning all!