He’s signed a new deal in the summer
There we are no need to worry
At a risk of continuing an off- thread topic - this is an interesting example. Semedo has, I suspect, a considerably higher sale value, but which of them has a higher value to us as a club?
Nah mate. Clowns.
Only until 2024… I say only because It’s great news if we plan to sell this summer, however I guess the ideal solution for both parties (assuming he won’t get the regular starter berth at Wolves he wants) would be Sheff Utd to get promoted via the playoffs and they loan him again. He gets to play regularly, we get to see what he can do in the prem. the massive catch then being is he’d only have 12 months left if we then decided to sell which clearly isn’t great
No, I think you are right. Although many here questioned if it was the right thing to do as it left us so thin in midfield.
No one has a right to start, they have to earn that right, but MGW never really had a consistent run in the side, nor was he played in a position that suited him, so he may have been around Wolves for 4-5 years but he was never really given a chance to shine.
If he had stayed I have no doubt he would have had to have fought for his place against those three but with Podence injured at the time and the way Trincao and Hwang played I am sure he would have got his chance.
I am glade someone else thinks the same about Goncalves. I saw a number of his games and although tidy I saw nothing to suggest he was a £50m player in the making.
We were never offered in the same galaxy as £60M for Adama.
He would have been fine this season in the 343 as he wouldn’t have been told to chalk his boots whenever he played. He’d have done way more than all of the forward players (barring MAYBE Podence). But, I’m still ok with him being out on loan for the season if he comes back and smashes it next season.
I’m interested to know what you have seen from either player this season to come to these opinions.
I’d preferably be taking Hwang out of that list but realise it’s not going to happen!! But yea, I’d be ok with that.
None of them are attacking midfielders aside from Trossard they are forward.
Benrahma fee will hit £26M, Bowen has already hit £25M - a reason you are bull****ting ? He also plays as a central striker as much as a wide player.In your opinion they are not attacking midfielders. They can all play (and have all played) wide or more centrally. In our side at the moment, who are the attacking midfielders? It's a wide/no.10 hybrid position, filled by the likes of Podence, Neto, etc.
Just look where MGW has been playing this season. The same, wide or more central. If MGW came back and played in our formation as it is now, that's where he would play. He's even played as a false 9 and led the line on occasions for Sheff Utd this season. He's more of a forward for Sheffield United than a midfield player.
This is in response to you saying you can't get a good PL attacking midfield player for £20m. You've agreed that Trossard is an attacking midfield player, and he's a good one that cost £14m.
The initial fees for Bown and Benrahma were also both below (or just above) £20m. You can't just make things up to try and prove yourself to be correct!
Categorically wrong, the debate started as to whether Dendoncker was signed on loan or permanently and then moved on to whether we'd sign Talisca
Still an outside chance he could get 1st Team Prem football next year with Sheff Utd, and from what I read he would be pretty sure of being given every chance to shine.
I’m of the same opinion with Goncalves, watched him at least 20 times but never saw the player he has turned out to be.
From watching lots of Sheff U games this year he seems to be playing very forward - often the furthest forward. He's like a striker for them or perhaps a very advanced 10.
So they didn't cost under £20M then did they?
