W
Wolfy1994
Guest
Jarvo and Kites with Hammill off the bench for last 25 minutes
W
Wolfy1994
Guest
Hunt's quality, but unfortunately we can't pick everyone :/
kidder_wolf_II
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2006
- Messages
- 8,887
- Reaction score
- 3,685
I still think Kightly could play that role aswel but its also a good shout regarding Hunt.
I dont no what everyone expects from Hunt but his stats speak for themselves. He can look poor for long spells but he sets up and scores his fair share over his career.
When all fit we will have 4 wingers who will all offer a great deal to the squad. Even if we go down we would only lose Jarvis.
Interesting that some people are thinking of kightly and hammill. I guess some people think that jarvis's crossing is hit and miss.
To be honest i am disappointed with hunt as he lacks pace and hasn't played to the standard he played at with hull. If he could get back to that standard we would warm to him more.
To be honest i am disappointed with hunt as he lacks pace and hasn't played to the standard he played at with hull. If he could get back to that standard we would warm to him more.
D
Deleted member 3751
Guest
At the minute I'd go Jarvis and Hammill but really hoping Kightly can get to his top form so we can see what he's really made of.
R
robwolf
Guest
Kites hasnt played enough to really be considered yet, so Hammill and Jarvis for me
D
dazmanwolf
Guest
Based on the Spurs game....Jarvis and Hammil
S
singwolf_1
Guest
We need to have another left winger in the team as back up for Jarvo.
F
FLEET WOLF
Guest
Jarvis and Kightly, if fit.
S
Sedgley Wolf
Guest
Hammill's proven he can pose a threat in the Prem so he just edges it ahead of Kites for now.
What a sub to come on for the last 20 minutes though. Hunt's a great back-up for Jarvis as well, or perhaps he can do a terrier-type role in midfield should O'Hara be unavailable?
What a sub to come on for the last 20 minutes though. Hunt's a great back-up for Jarvis as well, or perhaps he can do a terrier-type role in midfield should O'Hara be unavailable?
Gold Umbro
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2005
- Messages
- 3,013
- Reaction score
- 843
Can we have a 'quite happy with any pairing' option?
We've come a long way baby.
We've come a long way baby.
WolvesAreBoringOnCeefax
Moderator
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2007
- Messages
- 10,248
- Reaction score
- 1,397
That's Hunt now. At first he was S.Hunt-ed out onto the right wing but now we've got Hammill & hopefully Jarvis he can play on the left where he's more comfortable again. Which will be good because he looked a bit lost at times out on the right.
F
FetishWolf
Guest
Jarvis and Hunt, Hammil as an impact sub (he fades in the second half when he starts) directly for Hunt or move Hunt inside and replace for Milijas etc if we need to shut up shop a little in midfield late on etc
T
Toon Wolf
Guest
I'd go with Jarvis and Hammill. I believe that in a season or two's time Hammill will be the best winger we have at the club and will be an England regular.
M
MonkeySpanner
Guest
IF Kights can get and stay fit I think he and Jarvis would be my choice. Hammel looks excellent mind but the other two would be my starting pair.
As far as Hunt goes I love his box to box attitude and can see him playing in midfield in a 4-3-3 with Edwards on the other side and either O'Hara or Henry or even Miljas for that matter in the middle.
As far as Hunt goes I love his box to box attitude and can see him playing in midfield in a 4-3-3 with Edwards on the other side and either O'Hara or Henry or even Miljas for that matter in the middle.
Timberwolf
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2005
- Messages
- 10,972
- Reaction score
- 9,675
I'd like to see Hunt convert to a wing-back. Ashley cole-esque!
worc.wolves
Groupie
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
- Messages
- 187
- Reaction score
- 10
if kites can come back the same as he was before his injury id have him and jarvis hands down.
ive been impressed with hammil and agreed, he could be better than both. but at the cirrent time, given fitness and best form. kites and jarvis for me...
ive been impressed with hammil and agreed, he could be better than both. but at the cirrent time, given fitness and best form. kites and jarvis for me...
Bend It Like Dennison
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Messages
- 4,675
- Reaction score
- 224
I see Hunt as more of a central midfielder.
WalsallWolf
Just doesn't shut up
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2008
- Messages
- 13,128
- Reaction score
- 8,731
Don’t underestimate what Hunt brings to the plate. It is unfortunate that he picked up his calf injury when he did because that was the closest he has got to rediscovering the form he showed when we was willing to pay £5m for him. I think now we won’t see the best of him until next season, when we signed him I remember thinking it was a similar situation as to when the Villa brought Downing, he came back Oct/Nov time but didn’t show anything near his best till the following season with a full pre-season down him. If Hunt can get fit and have a full pre-season down him i am certain he will be a big player for us next year.
However, I think earlier on in the season, an unfit and lacking match sharpness Hunt was the worst thing that could have happened to Jarvis as he had to switch to the right to make way for him, and he is so easy for the full back to work out when playing on the right hand side. The way I see it is at the moment Hunt should be backup to Jarvis, and Kightly be backup to Hammill, rotate and have them compete in that order and that order only.
However, I think earlier on in the season, an unfit and lacking match sharpness Hunt was the worst thing that could have happened to Jarvis as he had to switch to the right to make way for him, and he is so easy for the full back to work out when playing on the right hand side. The way I see it is at the moment Hunt should be backup to Jarvis, and Kightly be backup to Hammill, rotate and have them compete in that order and that order only.