Exactly this. Of Atwells last 6 games hes reffed in the PL, 5 have involved Burnley (1), Sheff U (3) and Everton (1) - can’t be ***** to try and check VAR appointments
Why have Forest (or anyone else) not kicked up a fuss about these appointments? Because out of all the games only one had a...
His defence should be that his behaviour can be deemed to be subjective.
Whilst the ref may be hurt by his behaviour and his mean words, others may not deem it to be offensive - therefore unless there was a witness 150 miles away, to watch the interaction 20 times in slow motion, it would be...
1
Crystal Palace
0~3*
Man City
2
Aston Villa
2~1
Brentford
3
Everton
0~1
Burnley
4
Fulham
1~2
Newcastle
5
Luton
2~1
Bournemouth
6
Wolves
1~2
West Ham
7
Brighton
1~3*
Arsenal
8
Roma
2~0*
Lazio
9
Man Utd
1~3
Liverpool
10
Sheffield Utd
1~3
Chelsea
11
Tottenham
2~1
Nottingham...
Pretty sure that ‘uniqueness’ was dismissed as *******s by the panel - it was pointed out that 12 other clubs (13 including Forest) in the last 10 years had been promoted without parachute payments. So not exactly unique.
Read this article, sums it up pretty well.
Effectively what is difference, is it not just a case (as with Everton and Forest) that they breached the £105m (or £61m for Forest) PSR limit.
City have been charged with things like inflating commercial and sponsorship deals, making ‘off the books’...
yes it does seem to be, but as I see it the below is the 2 relevant sections by which the panel reached 6 points as the punishment.
Everton (at appeal) got 3 points for failing PSR and then an additional 3 points for the size of the breach AND providing ‘Incorrect’ information.
So the panel for...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.