 |
View Full Version : Takeover (Again) Bilston_Wolf 03-07-2007, 22:17 Do you think it will be completed this week? Last tuesday our potential new owner said it should be completed within 7 to 10 days, that takes us upto friday. I really hope it is all done and dusted this week, it's doing my head in now. Professional 03-07-2007, 22:28 It will happen within the next week. If it wasn't, we wouldn't have even signed Jarvis or Ward. robbeec 03-07-2007, 23:41 i do agree with you professional, but neither signing was exactly bank breaking was it....... Oxford Wolf 04-07-2007, 07:48 It will be completed by the end of the week, if not it will be next week or the week after trybalwolf 04-07-2007, 08:28 It will be completed by the end of the week, if not it will be next week or the week after ...or the week after that...... Del Woppio 04-07-2007, 08:40 It's happening. Calm down. G Unit 04-07-2007, 12:45 I reckon/hope it will be revealved with our biggest signing of the Summer - Eastwood . . . now let us pray Dr Wolfenstein 04-07-2007, 14:15 Don't hold your breath. From bitter experience, once lawyers are involved, in this instance unravelling complicated trust funds, they will spin it out for as long as they can to serve their own interests & line their own pockets. paddingtonwolf 04-07-2007, 14:16 I resent that. Why are people allowed to get away with saying that in such a prejudicial way against lawyers on the grounds of what they do for a living when they wouldn't dream of such a comment about a race or a sex? Francis Munro 04-07-2007, 14:19 I resent that. Why are people allowed to get away with saying that in such a prejudicial way against lawyers on the grounds of what they do for a living when they wouldn't dream of such a comment about a race or a sex? Get yourself a good lawyer and sue him then. wanderer24 04-07-2007, 14:23 All my experiences with lawyers have been negative, i've found them to be lazy, ill-informed, patronising, self-interested, money grabbing *******. John 04-07-2007, 14:27 I resent that. Why are people allowed to get away with saying that in such a prejudicial way against lawyers on the grounds of what they do for a living when they wouldn't dream of such a comment about a race or a sex? You can't chose your race or gender and so should not be discriminated against because of it. No-one however, is forced to become a grredy scum sucking $$$$ head oxygen thief of a lawyer. Therefore to be critised for the free choices you have made in life is quite right and proper. paddingtonwolf 04-07-2007, 14:29 :D fair point! Francis Munro 04-07-2007, 14:45 You can't chose your race or gender and so should not be discriminated against because of it. No-one however, is forced to become a grredy scum sucking $$$$ head oxygen thief of a lawyer. Therefore to be critised for the free choices you have made in life is quite right and proper. You should be a lawyer. PREM.L.L 04-07-2007, 15:03 Scally Morgso's gonna pull the plug i'm telling you.. UNCLE REMUS 04-07-2007, 19:52 You can't chose your race or gender and so should not be discriminated against because of it. No-one however, is forced to become a grredy scum sucking $$$$ head oxygen thief of a lawyer. Therefore to be critised for the free choices you have made in life is quite right and proper. How about if he's a lawyer of ethnic persuasion?;) Dr Wolfenstein 04-07-2007, 20:55 How about if he's a lawyer of ethnic persuasion?;) Two entirely different things. Like pharmaceutical companies in relation to the NHS, or Jihadists to democracy, lawyers are totally parasitical. |
