View Full Version : Open Letter to Highlander and his Pals
EasternWolf
23-01-2007, 10:24
Highlander, I have no idea why you continue with this non-stop anti Moxey tedium. What do you hope to gain? I think everyone on here is well aware of what you think or at least claim to think about the CEO. It is getting tedious because i suspect that most of us - those who like what Moxey is doing and those who dont, are sick of this endless drivel. It may have been slightly funny at one time. Now it is not.
It is really spoiling this forum and the moderators should be doing something about it because this goes beyond "free speech". You attempt to drag it in everywhere you can.
Wolves, the club most of us support, are doing ok. Many of us are happy about the changes that are being made and the way a young team is being put together. We would like to see them winning a bit more, but they are playing decent football without any prima donnas. I happen to believe the CEO is doing a good job supporting the manager and handling the financial aspects of the club in a sensible way. Others disagree with me and thats fine with me. However, neither I, nor them, feel a need to rehearse this stuff day in day out.
Please try to grow up.
paddingtonwolf
23-01-2007, 10:39
applause
whitemouse75
23-01-2007, 10:42
just do what lots of others are doing and read /post less. they'll get bored on their own
The Weasel
23-01-2007, 11:01
Seconded. All the arguments for and against have been repeated many many times. Those with entrenched views are not going to be swayed by anything that's said any more. I've tried to post balanced reasoned arguments but I either get slated, accused of being on the payroll, or ignored. There are two sides to every story, the truth lies somewhere in between. Moxey is not to blame for most of the stuff recently spouted against him, but he is to blame (for example) for keeping Hoddle on. Therefore he is never going to be all good/all bad. He's doing a good job with the finances and supporting MM to bring in a whole new exciting era at wolves. Some are so irrationally angry that they can't enjoy what's going on at their beloved club. What a shame for them, these are good times to be a wolves fan.
Del Woppio
23-01-2007, 11:08
It is a shame that one of the most exciting monts I can remember is being ruined by this hatred of a good employee. Group hug?
Kenny-11
23-01-2007, 11:15
one of the most exciting monts
With ya there..........I hate boring monts
HIGHLANDER
23-01-2007, 11:16
Highlander, I have no idea why you continue with this non-stop anti Moxey tedium. What do you hope to gain? I think everyone on here is well aware of what you think or at least claim to think about the CEO. It is getting tedious because i suspect that most of us - those who like what Moxey is doing and those who dont, are sick of this endless drivel. It may have been slightly funny at one time. Now it is not.
It is really spoiling this forum and the moderators should be doing something about it because this goes beyond "free speech". You attempt to drag it in everywhere you can.
Wolves, the club most of us support, are doing ok. Many of us are happy about the changes that are being made and the way a young team is being put together. We would like to see them winning a bit more, but they are playing decent football without any prima donnas. I happen to believe the CEO is doing a good job supporting the manager and handling the financial aspects of the club in a sensible way. Others disagree with me and thats fine with me. However, neither I, nor them, feel a need to rehearse this stuff day in day out.
Please try to grow up.I'll keep posting my opinions on here and you keep posting yours.I'm sorry if you don't like them but that's life.I suggest that if I upset and get to you so much you put me on your ignore list.http://www.21softs.com/emoticons/images/laughing2.gif
Cool, I always like it when someone is so upset about the number of threads about a certain topic that he starts a new thread on the very same topic.
Life is short: threads like this make it seem longer.
Del Woppio
23-01-2007, 11:24
With ya there..........I hate boring monts
Not as much as I hate boring $$$$$....
ROVERT47
23-01-2007, 11:26
Er,whats a Mont?
Del Woppio
23-01-2007, 11:32
I Missed A $$$$ing Aitch. I Am Not The First Person To Have A $$$$ing Typo. Bynch Of $$$$$$$$$$$$ing $$$$faces.
HIGHLANDER
23-01-2007, 11:34
Er,whats a Mont?Abbreviaion for Montana:confused:
Kenny-11
23-01-2007, 11:35
I Missed A $$$$ing Aitch. I Am Not The First Person To Have A $$$$ing Typo. Bynch Of $$$$$$$$$$$$ing $$$$faces.
You missed a "$"
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 11:37
I Missed A $$$$ing Aitch. I Am Not The First Person To Have A $$$$ing Typo. Bynch Of $$$$$$$$$$$$ing $$$$faces.
http://img303.imageshack.us/img303/6971/t611a1101cb8yf.jpg
ROVERT47
23-01-2007, 11:50
I Missed A $$$$ing Aitch. I Am Not The First Person To Have A $$$$ing Typo. Bynch Of $$$$$$$$$$$$ing $$$$faces.
Woops,sorry,i thought it might have been some kind of coded Mix speak.
The Weasel
23-01-2007, 12:01
That'll be a "no" to the group hug, then? ;)
leedswolf
23-01-2007, 12:04
Woops,
You've missed an aitch :rolleyes:
big-blue-wolf
23-01-2007, 12:14
I Missed A $$$$ing Aitch. I Am Not The First Person To Have A $$$$ing Typo. Bynch Of $$$$$$$$$$$$ing $$$$faces.
That is one of the best ever posts in the entire history of the internet :eek:
Wivey Wolf
23-01-2007, 12:26
Whats a bynch?
Looks Welsh to me, so you should know. Probably some sort of sheepshagger...
Wivey Wolf
23-01-2007, 12:28
Isn't it on the signs "Cymru am bynch"?
HIGHLANDER
23-01-2007, 12:37
Looks like there's not going to be a public hanging of poor old 'Highlander' http://www.21softs.com/emoticons/images/hang.gifwell today at least.
ROVERT47
23-01-2007, 12:38
You've missed an aitch :rolleyes:
:D
Ignoring Wivey's racist comments and getting back to EW's original point: until EW converts to Highlander's point of view why object if he continues to preach to the unbelievers? All religions do exactly the same and Wolves is the only true religion, after all.
ooh la la
23-01-2007, 12:42
It's Moxey's fault. ;)
It's Moxey's fault. ;)
Oh no it isn't ...
Oh no it isn't ...
Oh yes it is ...
Wivey Wolf
23-01-2007, 12:45
Ignoring Wivey's racist comments and getting back to EW's original point: until EW converts to Highlander's point of view why object if he continues to preach to the unbelievers? All religions do exactly the same and Wolves is the only true religion, after all.
I'm allowed - I married a Welsh girl and "some of my best friends" are Welsh...;)
RichRalph
23-01-2007, 12:45
A few good points made in the original post. The silent majority actually think Mr Moxey is doing (most) of his job pretty well, but shouting "Moxey in" sounds a bit silly.
As I put on another thread, let's just get along on Sunday and save the Moxey hating for another day.
All together now! "S*** on the Albion, S*** on the Albion todaaaayyyy"
The Weasel
23-01-2007, 12:47
A few good points made in the original post. The silent majority actually think Mr Moxey is doing (most) of his job pretty well, but shouting "Moxey in" sounds a bit silly.
As I put on another thread, let's just get along on Sunday and save the Moxey hating for another day.
All together now! "S*** on the Albion, S*** on the Albion todaaaayyyy"
or maybe...."Eat pies, if you love the Wolves" :D
A few good points made in the original post. The silent majority actually think Mr Moxey is doing (most) of his job pretty well, but shouting "Moxey in" sounds a bit silly.
As I put on another thread, let's just get along on Sunday and save the Moxey hating for another day.
All together now! "S*** on the Albion, S*** on the Albion todaaaayyyy"
but if they're silent how on earth can you purport to know their thoughts?
Bend It Like Dennison
23-01-2007, 12:54
Dear Mr Highlander & all his nasty, realist friends who actually frequent The Molineux more than once every decade
Please Please Please Please stop posting your hate messages on The Jez Moxey Fan Club website!!
I am sick & tired of reading your venom about what's supposedly going on at the club. So what if you've been lied to time & time again, had your seat moved for the biggest game at the Molineux for 3 years, payed an extra £6 for the pleasure & been offered a scaggy pie & a watery Carling as consolation? So what if you were one of the few hundred losers who payed to watch the 2nd half of the Cardiff game, who were stood in queue for 2 hours in the freezing cold? So what that its Moxey's job to make this club self sufficent & even after selling £6m worth of players in the summer, says we still have to go cap in hand to the man from Del Monte to sign a winger from non-league? Big, big deal!!
I for one, (& I am sure I speak for everyone including Zimbabwe Wolf, Beijing Bully & Wisconsin Wanderer) think we're doing just grrrrrrrrrreat. Wolves World told us so.
So **** all you match-going knickle dragging scum, take your opinions elsewhere. The Cyber Warriors on 'The Commentary Threads' know what's best for the Club.
Kind Regards
Bend It Like Seol
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 12:55
but if they're silent how on earth can you purport to know their thoughts?
I dont think its unreasonable to assume that the silent majority are content. If someone's annoyed then they're likely to make themselves heard....
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 12:57
Dear Mr Highlander & all his nasty, realist friends who actually frequent The Molineux more than once every decade
Please Please Please Please stop posting your hate messages on The Jez Moxey Fan Club website!!
I am sick & tired of reading your venom about what's supposedly going on at the club. So what if you've been lied to time & time again, had your seat moved for the biggest game at the Molineux for 3 years, payed an extra £6 for the pleasure & been offered a scaggy pie & a watery Carling as consolation? So what if you were one of the few hundred losers who payed to watch the 2nd half of the Cardiff game, who were stood in queue for 2 hours in the freezing cold? So what that its Moxey's job to make this club self sufficent & even after selling £6m worth of players in the summer, says we still have to go cap in hand to the man from Del Monte to sign a winger from non-league? Big, big deal!!
I for one, (& I am sure I speak for everyone including Zimbabwe Wolf, Beijing Bully & Wisconsin Wanderer) think we're doing just grrrrrrrrrreat. Wolves World told us so.
So **** all you match-going knickle dragging scum, take your opinions elsewhere. The Cyber Warriors on 'The Commentary Threads' know what's best for the Club.
Kind Regards
Bend It Like Seol
Would it be too much to ask you to pout your points across in a more constructive manner? EasternWOlf, in the post you are responding to, managed it, so why cant you?
Its possible to disagree with people without treating them with contempt, you know.
I'm allowed - I married a Welsh girl and "some of my best friends" are Welsh...;)
That's a really feeble excuse (though I was only joking about it being racist)
Premier Quality
23-01-2007, 12:59
Dear Mr Highlander & all his nasty, realist friends who actually frequent The Molineux more than once every decade
Please Please Please Please stop posting your hate messages on The Jez Moxey Fan Club website!!
blah blah blah
Blah
blah
blah
blah
Kind Regards
Bend It Like Seol
This stuff really does get very boring.
Wivey Wolf
23-01-2007, 12:59
That's a really feeble excuse (though I was only joking about it being racist)
Me too - she's only half Welsh...
I dont think its unreasonable to assume that the silent majority are content. If someone's annoyed then they're likely to make themselves heard....
only if they feel they can influence things by voicing their discontent, otherwise they are just a silent discontented majority.
It is unreasonable to assume that you know the opinion of the silent majority.
Me too - she's only half Welsh...
Your and her better half.
Stans the man
23-01-2007, 13:03
Dear Mr Highlander & all his nasty, realist friends who actually frequent The Molineux more than once every decade.... ad nauseum
You're not a very happy chap are you? Never mind, have a lie down.
Personally I think somewhere between the two camps is probably the most accurate version of events, so I take issue with the idea that you believe that you are the realists in this argument. I also seem to remember that it's been pointed out the WMP wanted the SB handed over to the Bennies, so why drag that one up again as a reason to hate the current structure? It only discredits your argument to a fence-sitter like me.
whitemouse75
23-01-2007, 13:09
and you havent had your seat moved.
Bend It Like Dennison
23-01-2007, 13:10
Would it be too much to ask you to pout your points across in a more constructive manner? EasternWOlf, in the post you are responding to, managed it, so why cant you?
Its possible to disagree with people without treating them with contempt, you know.
Are you OK?? That almost seemed a non abusive response??
I can list my problems with how my club is run in either a comedy or factual manner. Whatever suits the audience really.
My views arent entrenched- I want them to change. I want Moxey & Hayward to show they are thinking forward & not just 'managing' expectations as & when required.
Stans the man
23-01-2007, 13:12
I can list my problems with how my club is run in either a comedy or factual manner.
How about you do it in the style of Duncan Norvelle?
whitemouse75
23-01-2007, 13:13
i'd like to see an attempt at the comedy manner now please.
Bend It Like Dennison
23-01-2007, 13:15
This stuff really does get very boring.
Blah Blah Blah Blah...
The Weasel
23-01-2007, 13:16
Nice try BILD, but you typing that all the pro-Moxey posters are out of touch ex-pats doesnt make it any more true. I, like many others are STHs and whilst I have my disagreements with some of the things Moxey has done, by and large I (and the STHs around me that I've discussed this with) are broadly behind him, because put simply, he's actually doing a good job.
Premier Quality
23-01-2007, 13:16
But would you give credit if something good happened? and what would you see as being good? would you have given credit to the club if the WMP hadnt requested the stand and you hadnt had to move?
I apologise if you are not entrenched and would be open to different views, I get fed up with all the loud rhetoric when I am mainly interested in the football.... my view is that Jez does a good job in difficult circumstances, and I'm more than happy for you to have a different view - I just dont want to read it every other post on football related posts.
Bend It Like Dennison
23-01-2007, 13:16
i'd like to see an attempt at the comedy manner now please.
Did you ever find the culprit who smashed your BRAND NEW Audi wing mirror??
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 13:18
I can list my problems with how my club is run in either a comedy or factual manner. Whatever suits the audience really.
But if you choose to couch your arguments in such terms then you're in no position to complain when others respond in kind. The we end up with reams of bull$$$$ from all sides, all because someone decided that they'd post in an antagonistic manner. Perhaps if you posted in a more mature manner we could have an adult debate?
My views arent entrenched- I want them to change. I want Moxey & Hayward to show they are thinking forward & not just 'managing' expectations as & when required.
Well if you want people to respond with reasoned arguments that may change your mind then you should not eneter the debate with the kind of petulant claptrap that you posted in your 'letter'.
Stans the man
23-01-2007, 13:18
Did you ever find the culprit who smashed your BRAND NEW Audi wing mirror??
Was it Moxey?
Bend It Like Dennison
23-01-2007, 13:28
But would you give credit if something good happened? and what would you see as being good? would you have given credit to the club if the WMP hadnt requested the stand and you hadnt had to move?
Yes, however I am reluctant to give credit to them as some do on here, for the appointment of McCarthy & the new breed of young players coming through at present.
McCarthy was an accident- if Hoddle hadnt resigned liklehood is he'd still be here now. As for the new breed of young players coming through, well, we had to. What with having spunked £20m up the wall on has been players & has been managers over the last 10 years, it wasnt going to last forever was it. We were forced into going down this avenue. We didnt choose it.
And for what its worth, I dont even have to move seats. However I feel for those that do. Could you see us getting the Birmingham Rd End? Or Blues in the Holt End? Evereton in the Kop? Whichever way you look at it its just wrong. Old argument yes, but could have been avoided with a little more thought instead of just enflaming the situation even more.
Sunday will be a trouble-fest.
BridgnorthWolf Inc
23-01-2007, 13:39
This is like a witchhunt at the moment, unless we insult or slag off Moxey it appears we are as much the enemy as him.
I'm sure if there wasn't a clutch of "Moxey is a saint" for selling Leon Clarke, then there wouldn't be an equal number of anti-moxey threads popping up.
The views are equally ridiculous.
Moxey is neither responsible for every good thing that happens at the club or every bad thing.
However it is worth noting that MM appears to be above reproach, not matter what subs he picks or how results go.
This far into the season he is still in a honeymoon period, so Moxey coping alot of flack is serving a useful purpose.
Stans the man
23-01-2007, 13:52
I have to say in fairness that MM really has enjoyed a long and lasting amount of support so far into his tenure here, like John has said above. I thought the honeymoon period would have been over a while back, I'm delighted I'm wrong on this though.
BridgnorthWolf Inc
23-01-2007, 13:55
[quote=John;345020]I'm sure if there wasn't a clutch of "Moxey is a saint" for selling Leon Clarke, then there wouldn't be an equal number of anti-moxey threads popping up.
The views are equally ridiculous.
Moxey is neither responsible for every good thing that happens at the club or every bad thing. quote]
John, you and I have differing views on our CEO but your post is bang on. Having said that even you must admit that he came pretty close to sainthood for the Clarke deal. ;)
John, you and I have differing views on our CEO but your post is bang on. Having said that even you must admit that he came pretty close to sainthood for the Clarke deal. ;)
Sainthood for that and the devil incarnate for not fighting to keep the southbank.
Mistakes and successes, without a run either way.
Our CEO is the mirror of the team atm
whitemouse75
23-01-2007, 14:04
Did you ever find the culprit who smashed your BRAND NEW Audi wing mirror??
it wasnt brand new, it was the same age as the rest of the car. The replacement, hoewever, was indeed BRAND NEW.
Premier Quality
23-01-2007, 14:09
I think there is a lot of rubbish on both side - JM didnt sell clarke, that was the managers decision - however, he did get 250k for him, which does impress me. We got £5m for Jo Lescott, and however much I might think hes one of the best defenders in the country, I was still impressed with the fee, bearing in mind his injury record. I am always impressed with our transfer business in terms of how we conduct them and how much we pay and receive, which is his area.
I am not always impressed with the way the club conducts its news, recent events could and should have been handled much better, and that is also down to him.
However, on balance, I think he's doing a good job and Im happy hes at the club. He is not the anti-christ, nor is he the saviour of wolves.
Anyway, as Im now bored of the subject, Im not going to post any more. Have fun!
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 14:09
...and the devil incarnate for not fighting to keep the southbank.
Isnt it prudent of JM to only pick the fights that he has a chance of winning? If we are to beleive what was said in the club statement (and re-iterated at the parliament meeting) then Moxey had zero chance of changing plod's mind.
So it strikes me that trying to force the issue would only antagonise WMP, whose goodwill could come in handy in future....
Isnt it prudent of JM to only pick the fights that he has a chance of winning? If we are to beleive what was said in the club statement (and re-iterated at the parliament meeting) then Moxey had zero chance of changing plod's mind.
So it strikes me that trying to force the issue would only antagonise WMP, whose goodwill could come in handy in future....
I honestly think there is no goodwill when it comes to WMP and football. They forced him to pay 11K to police a match with no away fans, there is no goodwill
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 14:27
I honestly think there is no goodwill when it comes to WMP and football. They forced him to pay 11K to police a match with no away fans, there is no goodwill
But would you concede that, in a dispute between JM and WMP there would only ever be one winner?
But would you concede that, in a dispute between JM and WMP there would only ever be one winner?
Don't know?
If Arsenal can get away with it, I'm genuinely not sure what the outcome would have been.
None of us will ever know because we didn't try.
We should have tried.
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 14:49
Don't know?
If Arsenal can get away with it, I'm genuinely not sure what the outcome would have been.
None of us will ever know because we didn't try.
We should have tried.
Who says we didnt?
And isnt there a significant difference between ourselves and Arsenal - namely that we're able to pretty well segregate 15% of the ground (give or take), wheras Arsenal are unable to do the same at the Emirates?
Who says we didnt?
And isnt there a significant difference between ourselves and Arsenal - namely that we're able to pretty well segregate 15% of the ground (give or take), wheras Arsenal are unable to do the same at the Emirates?
The club said they didn't, well it's how I read it.
I thought Arsenal were able to segregate 15% of the emirates as it was designed for that. They just refused to have 9000 spurs fans in due to the increased possibility of trouble.
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 15:03
The club said they didn't, well it's how I read it.
I thought Arsenal were able to segregate 15% of the emirates as it was designed for that. They just refused to have 9000 spurs fans in due to the increased possibility of trouble.
From: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/sport/football.html?in_page_id=1779&in_article_id=429105
Carling Cup rules say both clubs are entitled to 15 per cent of the opposition ground capacity, but Arsenal refuse to give Tottenham 9,000 tickets for the second leg at their 60,000-seat Emirates Stadium because of safety concerns.
They have offered just 5,000 and claim to have correspondence from the Football Licensing Authority advising against giving their big rivals the full allocation.
Genuine reason, or convenient excuse? Who knows.
Either way, if plod say 'Give the southbank to WBA' then im not sure there's anything we can do to stop them - its patently absurd to say we're unable to do it.....
HIGHLANDER
23-01-2007, 15:28
Give them cake, pies and beer said mr Moxey.
Viva le Moxey, oVF wif tha ed of jean,Bild,Strewarton,Eastbay,Ilander http://www.21softs.com/emoticons/images/giljotiini.gif
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 15:32
Give them cake, pies and beer said mr Moxey.
Viva le Moxey, oVF wif tha ed of jean,Bild,Strewarton,Eastbay,Ilander http://www.21softs.com/emoticons/images/giljotiini.gif
Perhaps in future, before you press 'submit', you could ask 'Will this thread be useful/informative/stimulate debate?'
If the answer is 'no' then perhaps you can reconsider what you'vre written. That way we can improve the quality of whats written and the associated debate.
Give them cake, pies and beer said mr Moxey.
Viva le Moxey, oVF wif tha ed of jean,Bild,Strewarton,Eastbay,Ilander http://www.21softs.com/emoticons/images/giljotiini.gif
Drama queen...:rolleyes: Have your say - just accept others are entitled to do the same thing....
paddingtonwolf
23-01-2007, 15:37
I think I preferred the old Vis
HIGHLANDER
23-01-2007, 15:39
Perhaps in future, before you press 'submit', you could ask 'Will this thread be useful/informative/stimulate debate?'Coming from a man,who is to debate what George Bush is to peace.
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 15:41
Coming from a man,who is to debate what George Bush is to peace.
Id suggest that this response is a case in point. If you want MM to be a place where we can have a high level of debate then responses such as yours are surely unwelcome.
And if you *dont* want MM to be a place where we can have a high level of debate then what are you doing here?
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 15:42
I think I preferred the old Vis
He's still in there, somewhere, but through numerous deep breaths im keeping him locked away.
He's still in there, somewhere, but through numerous deep breaths im keeping him locked away.
Got a paper bag handy in case of hyperventilation?:D
HIGHLANDER
23-01-2007, 15:45
Drama queen...:rolleyes: Have your say - just accept others are entitled to do the same thing....:confused: Written in a post,on a thread which was telling me and others that we shouldn't have a say because Easternwolf disagrees with us.
Its a discussion forum... everyone can have their say within reason. However there may be limits as to how many threads can be used to say exactly the same thing....
HIGHLANDER
23-01-2007, 15:48
Got a paper bag handy in case of hyperventilation?:DCan I hold the bag please,pretty please.
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 15:49
:confused: Written in a post,on a thread which was telling me and others that we shouldn't have a say because Easternwolf disagrees with us.
Im not sure EasternWolf was saying that at all - I read his comments as saying that its generally only required to make a point once or twice. In fact, it could be argued that, with continued repetition, readers simlpy 'switch off', assuming that any new posts by certain posters are merely re-hashes of existing points, and so they may well miss any new insights or arguments that that poster is making.
leedswolf
23-01-2007, 15:53
I can list my problems with how my club is run in either a comedy or factual manner. Whatever suits the audience really.
Factual would be refreshing. I await. Thanks.
HIGHLANDER
23-01-2007, 15:59
Im not sure EasternWolf was saying that at all - I read his comments as saying that its generally only required to make a point once or twice. In fact, it could be argued that, with continued repetition, readers simlpy 'switch off', assuming that any new posts by certain posters are merely re-hashes of existing points, and so they may well miss any new insights or arguments that that poster is making.Truely unbelievable.This coming from a poster that has spoiled many a good thread (with the help of his cronies) by his obsession at ridiculing certain forum members posts as soon as they appear.
Ginger Chimp
23-01-2007, 16:03
This far into the season he ... [MM] ... is still in a honeymoon period...
Given the way certain factions of the Molineux faithful have been known to react to other managerial appointments, this is, perhaps, no bad thing.
Perhaps it is indicative of the "lowered expectations" that many said they would be happy with at the start of the season.
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 16:06
Truely unbelievable.This coming from a poster that has spoiled many a good thread (with the help of his cronies) by his obsession at ridiculing certain forum members posts as soon as they appear.
In the past, yes. I've now moved on.
Can you?
HIGHLANDER
23-01-2007, 16:07
Anyway, lets not spoil Easterns post.
I'm off to Asda now to get some pies and beer (Staple diet of the Southbanker),see you all later.
Luv ya lots.
[QUOTE=Bend It Like Dennison;345001]And for what its worth, I dont even have to move seats. However I feel for those that do. Could you see us getting the Birmingham Rd End? Or Blues in the Holt End? Evereton in the Kop?
QUOTE]
Question - Spot the odd one out Brummy Rd End, Holt End, South Bank, Kop
Answer - The South Bank, all of the others are home ends
What annoys me in the middle of the most positive period in the last 4 seasons, that people are singing 'Moxey Out' and about 'loyal fans', if you're that loyal get behind the team.
Isnt it prudent of JM to only pick the fights that he has a chance of winning? If we are to beleive what was said in the club statement (and re-iterated at the parliament meeting) then Moxey had zero chance of changing plod's mind.
So it strikes me that trying to force the issue would only antagonise WMP, whose goodwill could come in handy in future....
It's not like he's got anything else better to do, you know like transfer window deadlines, takeover bids etc..
Visage Wolf
23-01-2007, 16:28
It's not like he's got anything else better to do, you know like transfer window deadlines, takeover bids etc..
Well, quite....
IrchyWolf
23-01-2007, 16:32
[QUOTE=Bend It Like Dennison;345001]And for what its worth, I dont even have to move seats. However I feel for those that do. Could you see us getting the Birmingham Rd End? Or Blues in the Holt End? Evereton in the Kop?
QUOTE]
Question - Spot the odd one out Brummy Rd End, Holt End, South Bank, Kop
Answer - The South Bank, all of the others are home ends
And how could you tell, given the South Bank generates three times more vocal support than the other three stands put together?
Ther North Bank has its place in holy venerated ancient memory BUT could do with a reminder that Ted Vizard will not be playing on Sunday. It needs rather a lot of gingering up before it can assert its right to be regarded as "the home end" any longer. That probably goes for the last 25-30 years in reality.
[QUOTE=QB Wolf;345173]
And how could you tell, given the South Bank generates three times more vocal support than the other three stands put together?
Ther North Bank has its place in holy venerated ancient memory BUT could do with a reminder that Ted Vizard will not be playing on Sunday. It needs rather a lot of gingering up before it can assert its right to be regarded as "the home end" any longer. That probably goes for the last 25-30 years in reality.
Only if you sit in the South Bank is it 3 times as loud and all they sang on Saturday was rubbish that was detrimental to the performance anyway.
In my eyes tradition counts for a lot and luckily the club feels the same way.
wolf of sedgley
23-01-2007, 17:17
Only if you sit in the South Bank is it 3 times as loud and all they sang on Saturday was rubbish that was detrimental to the performance anyway.
In my eyes tradition counts for a lot and luckily the club feels the same way.
As opposed to the north bank who sang about two songs that lasted for about ten seconds each.
BridgnorthWolf Inc
23-01-2007, 17:41
This is like a flippin' school playground - it stinks of 'we're better that you'.
The SB certainly are the noisiest and quite obviously the best supporters in the land ever *TM.
