Kent_wolves_29
13-12-2006, 15:14
12 goals in 10 starts - didn't realise he was doing that well. On the box on Thursday against Spurs.
View Full Version : Vio Ganea
Wonder Boyo
13-12-2006, 15:34
Sounds like he is having a very good season. Maybe a little old now at 33 for an English club to come in for him though. Details here:
http://home.skysports.com/list.aspx?hlid=435047&CPID=131&clid=252&lid=2&title=Ganea+eyes+English+return
http://home.skysports.com/list.aspx?hlid=435047&CPID=131&clid=252&lid=2&title=Ganea+eyes+English+return
Nashie
13-12-2006, 15:34
He's rubbish. Money grabbing mercenary! etc ;)
Markwolf
13-12-2006, 15:44
Certainly more of a threat in the box than our impotent lot.
Wardrobe_Wolf
13-12-2006, 16:03
He was only offloaded because he didn't fit into Hoddle's backwards formation. He probably be our top scorer now if he was still here.
Mind you that's no massive task at the moment.
Mind you that's no massive task at the moment.
yammer
13-12-2006, 16:14
He's exactly the type of player we are looking for at the moment.
ProudWolf
13-12-2006, 16:20
He's exactly the type of player we are looking for at the moment.
Definately. I'd take him on a 6 month contract in January. He was wasted under Hoddle as we hardly ever put the ball into the box and he also offered us far more than Frankowski ever did.
Definately. I'd take him on a 6 month contract in January. He was wasted under Hoddle as we hardly ever put the ball into the box and he also offered us far more than Frankowski ever did.
stever
13-12-2006, 16:23
Lazy workshy fopp = Ganea
robbeec
13-12-2006, 16:30
If he'd come back to us I'd welcome him! He loved the area and always seemed to give his all. The small bonus being he actually seemed able to score goals
gaz kford
13-12-2006, 16:38
Lazy workshy fopp = Ganea
And your point is.
And your point is.
Wombourne Wolf
13-12-2006, 16:39
He would of been top goalscorer if was still here, unfortunatly his training ground bust up with O'Connor sealed his fate.
leedswolf
13-12-2006, 16:45
He's been and gone. Get over it.
stever
13-12-2006, 16:56
And your point is.
He is lazy and doesnt want to work for the team, enough said.
He is lazy and doesnt want to work for the team, enough said.
gaz kford
13-12-2006, 16:59
He is lazy and doesnt want to work for the team, enough said.
He would fit in well then. :p
He would fit in well then. :p
EasternWolf
13-12-2006, 17:19
I think we were wrong to get rid of him and the same with Frankowski. Class is permanent. Wolves never played to the strengths of either of them. A good player doesnt become a bad player overnight, but they often seem to when they come here. Ok people will say that Frankowski still isnt scoring, but thats not to say his form would not return alongside some of the current strikers and our wing men (pick 2 from all 5 of them). Ganea especially would have loved it this year.
stever
13-12-2006, 17:28
He still had the best celebration ever seen at the Mol when he launched himself into the crowd following the goal he got against????
Deutsch Wolf
13-12-2006, 17:34
Arsenal.
Markwolf
13-12-2006, 17:36
Also Preston I think last year?
wolfie smith
13-12-2006, 17:38
he'd be a snip at £1.7m, JEZ get on the phone he's the final piece:D
Bend It Like Dennison
13-12-2006, 17:40
No surprise to me- $$$$$$$ing quality player, would easily bag 20 goals in this league if he played 30+ games.
Treated abysmaly by Hoddle.
Treated abysmaly by Hoddle.
gaz kford
13-12-2006, 18:22
No surprise to me- $$$$$$$ing quality player, would easily bag 20 goals in this league if he played 30+ games.
Treated abysmaly by Hoddle.
Who wasn't?
I.E, Miller at Right back , Oakes Midfield , Nalyor Centre forward and Vio Left back in the changing rooms.:eek:
Treated abysmaly by Hoddle.
Who wasn't?
I.E, Miller at Right back , Oakes Midfield , Nalyor Centre forward and Vio Left back in the changing rooms.:eek:
Nashie
13-12-2006, 18:24
He was a battler and was our best finisher. Amazing to think we spent 1.4 million on Frankowski when we already had Ganea.
EasternWolf
13-12-2006, 19:10
Wasnt there one time when it looked as if Oakes would be left back for a game? Was that under Jones or Hoddle??
Kenny-11
13-12-2006, 19:11
Wasnt there one time when it looked as if Oakes would be left back for a game? Was that under Jones or Hoddle??
That was under Jones. Away at Burnley when Lescott made his comeback.
That was under Jones. Away at Burnley when Lescott made his comeback.
Essex Wolf
13-12-2006, 19:28
I think we were wrong to get rid of him and the same with Frankowski. Class is permanent. Wolves never played to the strengths of either of them. A good player doesnt become a bad player overnight, but they often seem to when they come here. Ok people will say that Frankowski still isnt scoring, but thats not to say his form would not return alongside some of the current strikers and our wing men (pick 2 from all 5 of them). Ganea especially would have loved it this year.
Agreed and he couldn't do much worse than the players passed off as forwards at Molineux these days.
Agreed and he couldn't do much worse than the players passed off as forwards at Molineux these days.
Tarcisio Mifsud
14-12-2006, 06:10
I liked the player and he had to leave because Hoddle did not want him in the team or in his plans, but one may ask, what were Hoddle plans, just playing the ball around without ever shooting. There were times when in the whole 90 minutes and more, our players only shot twice at goal.
Then he brought Frans, when we had Ganea which could do a much better job as he could score goals, even if he did practically nothing throughout the match. What a waste of money by Hoddle. Ganea was an international players who in his days and before he was injured could play against any opponent and still manage to score at frequent intervals.
It was Dave Jones wrong decision on preseason tour to Norway ( a very cold country, when players should go to a warm country in their preseasons tour) that got Ganea injured. If anything it was our team that damaged the player's reputation and not the other way round, for even in the premier he could battle very well against much stronger opponents, his goal against Arsenal is a case in point.
Wish him well.
Then he brought Frans, when we had Ganea which could do a much better job as he could score goals, even if he did practically nothing throughout the match. What a waste of money by Hoddle. Ganea was an international players who in his days and before he was injured could play against any opponent and still manage to score at frequent intervals.
It was Dave Jones wrong decision on preseason tour to Norway ( a very cold country, when players should go to a warm country in their preseasons tour) that got Ganea injured. If anything it was our team that damaged the player's reputation and not the other way round, for even in the premier he could battle very well against much stronger opponents, his goal against Arsenal is a case in point.
Wish him well.
John
14-12-2006, 07:45
He's been and gone. Get over it.
Is it against football league rules to re-sign a player?
Is it against football league rules to re-sign a player?
leedswolf
14-12-2006, 09:27
Is it against football league rules to re-sign a player?
:rolleyes:
:rolleyes:
John
14-12-2006, 09:35
:rolleyes:
Is that :rolleyes: = yes
or:rolleyes: = no???
Is that :rolleyes: = yes
or:rolleyes: = no???
leedswolf
14-12-2006, 09:39
Is that :rolleyes: = yes
or:rolleyes: = no???
:rolleyes: = ffs
or:rolleyes: = no???
:rolleyes: = ffs
JJ82
14-12-2006, 09:55
I think we were wrong to get rid of him and the same with Frankowski. Class is permanent. Wolves never played to the strengths of either of them. A good player doesnt become a bad player overnight, but they often seem to when they come here. Ok people will say that Frankowski still isnt scoring, but thats not to say his form would not return alongside some of the current strikers and our wing men (pick 2 from all 5 of them). Ganea especially would have loved it this year.
spot on EW
spot on EW
John
14-12-2006, 10:01
:rolleyes: = ffs
So can we bring him back or not?
Why because we sold him once, should we forget about him?
So can we bring him back or not?
Why because we sold him once, should we forget about him?
leedswolf
14-12-2006, 10:03
So can we bring him back or not?
Why because we sold him once, should we forget about him?
It isn't going to happen IMO............................
Why because we sold him once, should we forget about him?
It isn't going to happen IMO............................
John
14-12-2006, 10:05
It isn't going to happen IMO............................
So we can't discuss anything you think won't happen?
Care to list topics that are acceptable?
So we can't discuss anything you think won't happen?
Care to list topics that are acceptable?
leedswolf
14-12-2006, 10:09
So we can't discuss anything you think won't happen?
Care to list topics that are acceptable?
Are you on drugs?
Please show me where I've stated that it isn't open to discussion? I've given my opinion on the matter just as other posters have.
Care to list topics that are acceptable?
Are you on drugs?
Please show me where I've stated that it isn't open to discussion? I've given my opinion on the matter just as other posters have.
John
14-12-2006, 10:15
Please show me where I've stated that it isn't open to discussion? I've given my opinion on the matter just as other posters have.
He's been and gone. Get over it.
Seems pretty clear to me.
He's been and gone. Get over it.
Seems pretty clear to me.
leedswolf
14-12-2006, 10:19
Seems pretty clear to me.
Yep clearly it's an opinion not an edict.
Yep clearly it's an opinion not an edict.
John
14-12-2006, 10:20
Yep clearly it's an opinion not an edict.
It's clearly a stroppy idiotic edict.
Feel free to call it an opinion.
It's clearly a stroppy idiotic edict.
Feel free to call it an opinion.
leedswolf
14-12-2006, 10:21
It's clearly a stroppy idiotic edict.
Feel free to call it an opinion.
Is it? That's your opinion.
I thank you for your graciousness.
Feel free to call it an opinion.
Is it? That's your opinion.
I thank you for your graciousness.
yammer
14-12-2006, 10:23
LW can i ask a question? Do you ever disagree with anything the club does? It just seems to me that every single thread you comment on is to disagree with people who aren't happy or are discussing something they think shouldn't have been done. I didn't realise Wolves were currently flying high at the top of the Premiership.
leedswolf
14-12-2006, 10:27
LW can i ask a question? Do you ever disagree with anything the club does? It just seems to me that every single thread you comment on is to disagree with people who aren't happy or are discussing something they think shouldn't have been done. I didn't realise Wolves were currently flying high at the top of the Premiership.
Yes I do disagree with some of the things that Wolves do or don't do. I'm aware of Wolves' league status thank you. It's a discussion board and primarily I agree or disagree on what is posted by the contributors.
Yes I do disagree with some of the things that Wolves do or don't do. I'm aware of Wolves' league status thank you. It's a discussion board and primarily I agree or disagree on what is posted by the contributors.
